Applying Translational Science Approaches to Protect Workers Exposed to Nanomaterials
- PMID: 35757639
- PMCID: PMC9226388
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816578
Applying Translational Science Approaches to Protect Workers Exposed to Nanomaterials
Abstract
Like nanotechnology, translational science is a relatively new and transdisciplinary field. Translational science in occupational safety and health (OSH) focuses on the process of taking scientific knowledge for the protection of workers from the lab to the field (i.e., the worksite/workplace) and back again. Translational science has been conceptualized as having multiple phases of research along a continuum, beyond scientific discovery (T0), to efficacy (T1), to effectiveness (T2), to dissemination and implementation (D&I) (T3), to outcomes and effectiveness research in populations (T4). The translational research process applied to occupational exposure to nanomaterials might involve similar phases. This builds on basic and efficacy research (T0 and T1) in the areas of toxicology, epidemiology, industrial hygiene, medicine and engineering. In T2, research and evidence syntheses and guidance and recommendations to protect workers may be developed and assessed for effectiveness. In T3, emphasis is needed on D&I research to explore the multilevel barriers and facilitators to nanotechnology risk control information/research adoption, use, and sustainment in workplaces. D&I research for nanomaterial exposures should focus on assessing sources of information and evidence to be disseminated /implemented in complex and dynamic workplaces, how policy-makers and employers use this information in diverse contexts to protect workers, how stakeholders inform these critical processes, and what barriers impede and facilitate multilevel decision-making for the protection of nanotechnology workers. The T4 phase focuses on how effective efforts to prevent occupational exposure to nanomaterials along the research continuum contribute to large-scale impact in terms of worker safety, health and wellbeing (T4). Stakeholder input and engagement is critical to all stages of the translational research process. This paper will provide: (1) an illustration of the translational research continuum for occupational exposure to nanomaterials; and (2) a discussion of opportunities for applying D&I science to increase the effectiveness, uptake, integration, sustainability, and impact of interventions to protect the health and wellbeing of workers in the nanotechnology field.
Keywords: dissemination; impact; implementation; nanotechnology; research.
Copyright © 2022 Schulte, Guerin, Cunningham, Hodson, Murashov and Rabin.
Conflict of interest statement
PS was employed by the company Advanced Technologies and Laboratories (ATL) International, Inc., under contract with NIOSH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Jul;56(5):491-505. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes040. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012. PMID: 22752094 Review.
-
Sharpening the focus on occupational safety and health in nanotechnology.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Dec;34(6):471-8. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1292. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008. PMID: 19137209
-
General principles of medical surveillance: implications for workers potentially exposed to nanomaterials.J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Jun;53(6 Suppl):S22-4. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1e45. J Occup Environ Med. 2011. PMID: 21606848 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dissemination and Implementation Science Approaches for Occupational Safety and Health Research: Implications for Advancing Total Worker Health.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;18(21):11050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111050. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34769573 Free PMC article.
-
Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1234. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1234. eCollection 2022 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36911341 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kuhlbusch TAJ, Winhoven SWP, Haase A. Nanomaterial exposures for workers, consumers and the general public. Nanoimpact. (2018) 10:11–25. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.11.003 - DOI
-
- Oberbek P, Kozikowski P, Czarmeche K, Sobien P, Jakubiok S, Jankowski T. Inhalation exposure to various nanoparticles in work environment- contextual information and results of measurements. J Nanopart Res. (2019) 21:222. 10.1007/s11051-019-4651-x - DOI
-
- SCENIHR . Request for a Scientific Opinion on the Appropriateness of Existing Methodologies to Assess the Potential Risks Associated With Engineered and Adventitious Nanotechnologies. Brussels: Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks; (2006).
-
- Hett A. Nanotechnology, Small Matter, Many Unknowns. Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company; (2004).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous