Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 16;109(9):864-871.
doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac226.

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

Collaborators, Affiliations

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

Sander Ubels et al. Br J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.

Methods: This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.

Results: Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.

Conclusion: The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Calibration plot of the SEAL score The calibration slope was 1.12 (95 per cent c.i. 0.93 to 1.31) and resembles the strength of predictors. The calibration intercept was 0.00 (95 per cent c.i. –0.17 to 0.17), and resembles the ‘calibration in the large’ indicating whether the model systematically overpredicts or underpredicts. Discrimination: c-index 0.77 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). The shaded area displays the 95 per cent confidence interval of the flexible calibration curve. The triangles plotted in the calibration curve represent observed proportion versus predicted probabilities for decile predictions, with error bars indicating 95 per cent confidence interval for a specific decile. The broom plot at the bottom shows the distribution of predicted probabilities for 90-day mortality in patients who did (1) or did not (0) die within 90 days. SEAL, Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak.

References

    1. Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group; West Midlands Research Collaborative . Rates of anastomotic complications and their management following esophagectomy: results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). Ann Surg 2022;275:382–390 - PubMed
    1. van Workum F, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, Bouwense SAW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F et al. Intrathoracic vs cervical anastomosis after totally or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2021;156:601–610 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuppusamy MK, Low DE; International Esodata Study Group . Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a 4-year study of > 6000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online Esodata database. Ann Surg 2020;275:515–525 - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424 - PubMed
    1. Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit . Core Figures 2015–2019 (Basis Tabel 2015–2019). Leiden: Dutch Institute for Cancer Auditing, 2020

MeSH terms

Grants and funding