Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jul:81:104102.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104102. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

Response of COVID-19 vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients following disease-modifying therapies: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Response of COVID-19 vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients following disease-modifying therapies: A meta-analysis

Xi Wu et al. EBioMedicine. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), while disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) may influence the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of DMTs on immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in pwMS.

Methods: Literature search from December 1, 2019 to March 31, 2022 was performed in PubMed, MedRxiv, Embase and Cochrane Library. The risk of impaired response to vaccination in pwMS receiving DMTs was estimated in odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects method.

Findings: A total of 48 studies comprising 6860 pwMS were included. Overall, pwMS with anti-CD20 (OR=0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator (S1PRM) (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.06) treatments had attenuated serologic response after full vaccination compared with those without DMTs. Additionally, pwMS vaccinated within six months since last anti-CD20 therapy were at significantly higher risk of blunted response compared with those receiving anti-CD20 therapy more than six months prior to vaccination (P = 0.001). We found no significant associations between other treatments (including IFN-β, GA, DMF, TERI, NTZ, CLAD, and ALE) and humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS. As for T-cell response, no significant difference was found between pwMS on anti-CD20 and those without DMTs after vaccination, while S1PRM was marginally associated with impaired cellular response (P = 0.03).

Interpretation: Our findings suggested that routine serological monitoring may be required for pwMS on anti-CD20 and S1PRMs after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and highlighted the benefits of a booster dose. The effect of cellular response and optimal interval from last anti-CD20 treatment to vaccination should be further addressed.

Funding: This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1433000).

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccines; Disease-modifying therapies; Immune response; Meta-analysis; Multiple sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk of impaired serological response after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in pwMS on different DMTs by Z-test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of seroconversion rates (%) in pwMS treated with different DMTs after the first dose (a) and second dose (b) of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Each point indicates a study cohort where data were available. Pairwise comparisons are based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U independent-samples test (patients without DMTs as reference group). HC: healthy controls, UN: untreated pwMS, *: P = 0.03, **: P = 0.001 and ***: P < 10−5).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots of seropositivity rates (%) in pwMS stratified by different anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Each point indicates a study cohort where data were available. Pairwise comparisons are based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U independent-samples test (patients with ocrelizumab as reference group). OCR: ocrelizumab, RTX: rituximab, OFA: ofatumumab, NS: not significant (P = 0.91), **: P = 0.0058.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplots of T-cell response rate (%) in pwMS on Anti-CD20, S1PRMs and without DMTs after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Each point indicates a study cohort where data were available. Pairwise comparisons are based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U independent-samples test (patients without DMTs as reference group). UN: untreated, NS: not significant (P =  0.63), *: P =  0.03.

References

    1. Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med. 2020;133(12) 1380-90.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, et al. Association of initial disease-modifying therapy with later conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):175–187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luna G, Alping P, Burman J, et al. Infection risks among patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod, natalizumab, rituximab, and injectable therapies. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(2):184–191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sormani MP, De Rossi N, Schiavetti I, et al. Disease-modifying therapies and coronavirus disease 2019 severity in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(4):780–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safavi F, Nourbakhsh B, Azimi AR. B-cell depleting therapies may affect susceptibility to acute respiratory illness among patients with multiple sclerosis during the early COVID-19 epidemic in Iran. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;43 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types