Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Sep;27(9):3658-3669.
doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01652-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

Blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gustavo C Medeiros et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

(R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and its enantiomer (S)-ketamine (esketamine) can produce rapid and substantial antidepressant effects. However, individual response to ketamine/esketamine is variable, and there are no well-accepted methods to differentiate persons who are more likely to benefit. Numerous potential peripheral biomarkers have been reported, but their current utility is unclear. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis examining the association between baseline levels and longitudinal changes in blood-based biomarkers, and response to ketamine/esketamine. Of the 5611 citations identified, 56 manuscripts were included (N = 2801 participants), and 26 were compatible with meta-analytical calculations. Random-effect models were used, and effect sizes were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD). Our assessments revealed that more than 460 individual biomarkers were examined. Frequently studied groups included neurotrophic factors (n = 15), levels of ketamine and ketamine metabolites (n = 13), and inflammatory markers (n = 12). There were no consistent associations between baseline levels of blood-based biomarkers, and response to ketamine. However, in a longitudinal analysis, ketamine responders had statistically significant increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) when compared to pre-treatment levels (SMD [95% CI] = 0.26 [0.03, 0.48], p = 0.02), whereas non-responders showed no significant changes in BDNF levels (SMD [95% CI] = 0.05 [-0.19, 0.28], p = 0.70). There was no consistent evidence to support any additional longitudinal biomarkers. Findings were inconclusive for esketamine due to the small number of studies (n = 2). Despite a diverse and substantial literature, there is limited evidence that blood-based biomarkers are associated with response to ketamine, and no current evidence of clinical utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING INTERESTS

TDG is listed as co-author on patent and patent applications related to the pharmacology and use of (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine in the treatment of depression, anxiety, anhedonia, suicidal ideation, and post-traumatic stress disorder. He has assigned his patent rights to the University of Maryland Baltimore, but will share a percentage of any royalties that may be received. TDG has received research funding from Allergan and Roche Pharmaceuticals, and has served as a consultant for FSV7 LLC, during the preceding 3 years. NBF holds patents pertaining to improved use of NMDA antagonists as therapeutic agents. EDA has served on advisory boards for Alkermes, Janssen, Lundbeck/Otsuka, Roche, Sunovion and Teva and reports previous stock holdings in AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Pfizer. EDA has received research support from Alkermes, Astellas, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, InnateVR, Janssen, National Network of Depression Centers, Neurocrine Biosciences, Novartis, Otsuka, Pear Therapeutics, Takeda and serves on the SMI Adviser LAI Center of Excellence (unpaid). BS reports research time support from Medibio (unrelated to the current study); grant support from Mayo Clinic. SS has received grants/research support from NIMH R21 (1R21MH119441 – 01A1) and SAMHSA (FG000470-01) and research supplement funds from The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. SS has received speaking honoraria from British Medical Journal Publishing Group and received research support from Compass pathways, Janssen and LivaNova. RMV has received consulting fees from Eurofarma Pharmaceuticals. Abbott and BioStrategies group, and has a research contract for trials with Janssen and Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. RMV has also received speaker fees from Otsuka, Lundbeck, EMS, and Cristalia and is a member of the scientific board of Symbinas Pharmaceuticals and Allergan. SVP has received honoraria for consulting or research funds from Assurex (Myriad), Sage, Otsuka, Takeda, Janssen, Aifred, Mensante, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Ontario Brain Institute, and the Flinn Foundation. MAF has received Grant Support from Assurex Health, and Mayo Foundation. He also has financial interests in Chymia LLC. CAZ is a full-time U.S government employee. He is listed as a coinventor on a patent for the use of ketamine in major depression and suicidal ideation. CAZ is listed as a coinventor on a patent for the use of (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine, (S)-dehydronorketamine, and other stereoisomeric dehydro and hydroxylated metabolites of (R,S)-ketamine metabolites in the treatment of depression and neuropathic pain. CAZ is listed as co-inventor on a patent application for the use of (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine and (2 S,6 S)-hydroxynorketamine in the treatment of depression, anxiety, anhedonia, suicidal ideation, and post-traumatic stress disorders. CAZ has assigned his patent rights to the U.S. government but will share a percentage of any royalties that may be received by the government. FSG has received research grant support from Janssen Therapeutics. GCM, WLP, JN, and MFG do not have conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. PRISMA flow diagram of systematic searches for studies assessing blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine.
aDatabases used in the searches: Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science. bHand searching included screening of review articles, grey literature, included papers and manuscripts that cited the included papers. cMeta-analytical calculations were conducted only if there were comparable data on the same blood-based biomarker for at least three studies. If a biomarker was examined in studies with overlapping samples, only the study with largest sample size was included.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Meta-analytical calculations comparing post-treatment and baseline blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (pg/ml) in responders and non-responders to ketamine (n = 331, 11 studies).
*Responder = participant with least at 50% improvement in depression scores. **The manuscript by Kang & Vasquez (2021) had only one non-responder, therefore, it was not possible to conduct meta-analytical calculations for the non-responder group in their study.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Meta-analytical calculations comparing the blood levels of ketamine (pg/ml) and norketamine (pg/ml) in responders and non-responders to ketamine (n = 286, 9 studies).
*Responder = participant with at least 50% improvement in depression scores. **Blood levels of ketamine and norketamine were measured at the same timepoint for responders and non-responders in individual studies. However, the timepoints were not the same across all studies (varied from during the infusion to 24 h post-infusion). The specific timepoints were: Andrashko et al. (2020) = immediately post-infusion; Chen et al. (2021) = 200 min post-infusion; Diazgranados et al., (2010) = 190 min post-infusion; Farmer et al. (2020) = 190 min post-infusion; Grunebaum et al., (2017) = immediately post-infusion; Grunebaum et al., (2019) = immediately post-infusion; Lenze et al. (2016) = 24 h post-infusion; Milak et al. (2020) = area under the curve calculated as the sum of the blood levels at 50 and 80 min post-infusion; Siegel et al. (2021) = 24 h post-infusion.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Meta-analytical calculations comparing post-treatment and baseline blood levels of pro-inflammatory markers in responders and non-responders to ketamine.
*Responder = participant with at least 50% improvement in depression scores. **The manuscript by Kang & Vasquez (2021) had only one non-responder, therefore, it was not possible to conduct meta-analytical calculations for the non-responder group in their study.

References

    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Warden D, Ritz L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR* D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:28–40. - PubMed
    1. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Stewart JW, Nierenberg AA, Fava M, Kurian BT, et al. Combining medications to enhance depression outcomes (CO-MED): acute and long-term outcomes of a single-blind randomized study. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:689–701. - PubMed
    1. Thase ME, Mahableshwarkar AR, Dragheim M, Loft H, Vieta E. A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26:979–93. - PubMed
    1. Patel K, Allen S, Haque MN, Angelescu I, Baumeister D, Tracy DK. Bupropion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness as an antidepressant. Therapeutic Adv Psychopharmacol. 2016;6:99–144. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldessarini RJ, Vázquez GH, Tondo L. Bipolar depression: a major unsolved challenge. Int J bipolar Disord. 2020;8:1–13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms