Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 27;18(1):66.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00857-x.

A comparative analysis of experienced uncertainties in relation to risk communication during COVID19: a four-country study

Florin Cristea  1 , Heide Weishaar  1 , Brogan Geurts  1 , Alexandre Delamou  2 , Melisa Mei Jin Tan  3 , Helena Legido-Quigley  3 , Kafayat Aminu  4 , Almudena Mari-Sáez  5 , Carlos Rocha  5 , Bienvenu Camara  6 , Lansana Barry  7 , Paul Thea  7 , Johannes Boucsein  8   9   10 , Thurid Bahr  1 , Sameh Al-Awlaqi  1 , Francisco Pozo-Martin  1 , Evgeniya Boklage  11 , Ayodele Samuel Jegede  4 , Charbel El Bcheraoui  12
Affiliations

A comparative analysis of experienced uncertainties in relation to risk communication during COVID19: a four-country study

Florin Cristea et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: During outbreaks, uncertainties experienced by affected communities can influence their compliance to government guidance on public health. Communicators and authorities are, hence, encouraged to acknowledge and address such uncertainties. However, in the midst of public health crises, it can become difficult to define and identify uncertainties that are most relevant to address. We analyzed data on COVID-19-related uncertainties from four socio-economic contexts to explore how uncertainties can influence people's perception of, and response to Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) strategies.

Results: This qualitative study, which adopts an interpretative approach, is based on data from a documentary review, key informant interviews (KII), and focus group discussions (FGD) with members of the general public and people with barriers to information from Germany, Guinea, Nigeria, and Singapore. Transcripts from the KII and FGD were coded and analyzed thematically. We interviewed a total of 155 KIs and conducted 73 FGD. Our analysis uncovered a divergence between uncertainties deemed relevant by stakeholders involved in policy making and uncertainties that people reportedly had to navigate in their everyday lives and which they considered relevant during the pandemic. We identified four types of uncertainties that seemed to have influenced people's assessment of the disease risk and their trust in the pandemic control strategies including RCCE efforts: epidemiological uncertainties (related to the nature and severity of the virus), information uncertainties (related to access to reliable information), social uncertainties (related to social behavior in times of heightened risk), and economic uncertainties (related to financial insecurities).

Conclusion: We suggest that in future outbreaks, communicators and policy makers could improve the way in which affected communities assess their risk, and increase the trust of these communities in response efforts by addressing non-epidemiological uncertainties in RCCE strategies.

Keywords: Risk assessment; Risk communication and community engagement; Trust; Uncertainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Ratzan SC, Sommariva S, Rauh L. Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Res Pract. 2020;30(2):3022010. - PubMed
    1. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912–920. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peng S, Yang XY, Yang T, Zhang W, Cottrell RR. Uncertainty stress, and its impact on disease fear and prevention behavior during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: a panel study. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(2):334–341. - PubMed
    1. Lieberoth A, Lin SY, Stöckli S, Han H, Kowal M, Gelpi R, et al. Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. R Soc Open Sci. 2021;8(2):200589. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taha S, Matheson K, Cronin T, Anisman H. Intolerance of uncertainty, appraisals, coping, and anxiety: the case of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(3):592–605. - PubMed

Publication types