Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
- PMID: 35763272
- PMCID: PMC9137382
- DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-42-2022-03
Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review
Abstract
Risultati dei test psicofisici olfattivi e gustativi durante l’infezione COVID-19: revisione della letteratura.
Riassunto: La maggioranza degli studi ha valutato la capacità olfattiva e gustativa nei pazienti COVID-19 con questionari e autovalutazione. Data l’eterogeneità della letteratura pubblicata, lo scopo di questa ‘review’ è stato quello di analizzare gli articoli sull’argomento, focalizzando l’attenzione sui test psicofisici. È stata eseguita una ricerca su PubMed e Web of Science da dicembre 2019 a novembre 2021. I principali criteri di inclusione sono stati articoli in lingua inglese, che studiavano le caratteristiche cliniche dell’olfatto e del gusto nei pazienti COVID-19 utilizzando test soggettivi, psicofisici e ‘imaging’ radiologico. In totale sono stati identificati 638 articoli e di questi ne sono stati inclusi 66. In 31 studi è stata eseguita una valutazione soggettiva, mentre in 30 sono stati utilizzati test psicofisici e in 5 tecniche di ‘imaging’ radiologico. La prevalenza della disfunzione chemosensoriale è stata l’argomento più studiato, seguita dal tempo di recupero. Per quanto riguarda la valutazione psicofisica, gli Sniffin’ Sticks sono stati utilizzati in 11 articoli e il test del Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center in altri 11. La performance della soglia olfattiva è stata la più intaccata rispetto alle capacità di discriminazione e identificazione in linea con l’ipotesi di un tropismo del virus COVID-19 per la mucosa olfattoria. La tempistica ha influenzato significativamente i risultati del test psicofisico con solo il 20% dei pazienti affetti da disfunzione olfattiva dopo un mese dall’infezione.
Keywords: COVID-19; anosmia; infections; olfaction disorders; rhinology; smell; taste.
Plain language summary
Only a few studies have assessed smell and taste in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with psychophysical tests, while the majority performed self-rating evaluations. Given the heterogeneity of the published literature, the aim of this review was to systematically analyse the articles on this topic with a focus on psychophysical testing. A search on PubMed and Web of Science from December 2019, to November 2021, with cross-references, was executed. The main eligibility criteria were English-language articles, investigating the clinical features of olfaction and gustation in COVID-19 patients using self-rating assessment, psychophysical testing and imaging techniques. A total of 638 articles were identified and 66 were included. Self-rating assessment was performed in 31 studies, while psychophysical testing in 30 and imaging techniques in 5. The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction was the most investigated topic, followed by the recovery time. About the psychophysical assessment, the extended version of the Sniffin’ Sticks was used in 11 articles and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test in another 11. The olfactory threshold performance was the most impacted compared to the discrimination and identification capacities in accordance with the hypothesis of a tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for the olfactory mucosa. The timing significantly influenced the results of the psychophysical testing with 20% of patients presenting olfactory dysfunction at one month after infection.
Figures



Similar articles
-
COVID-19: Recovery from Chemosensory Dysfunction. A Multicentre study on Smell and Taste.Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):1095-1100. doi: 10.1002/lary.29383. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 33404079
-
SARS-CoV-2 Effects on Psychophysical Olfactory Scores: Prospective Study With Evaluation Before and 60-Days After Infection.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 May;168(5):1249-1252. doi: 10.1002/ohn.166. Epub 2023 Feb 23. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 36821798
-
Psychophysical assessment of olfactory and gustatory function in post-mild COVID-19 patients: A matched case-control study with 2-year follow-up.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Oct;13(10):1864-1875. doi: 10.1002/alr.23148. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023. PMID: 36852674
-
Sudden onset, acute loss of taste and smell in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review.Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Aug;78(6):467-473. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1787505. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020. PMID: 32762282
-
The taste of the pandemic-contemporary review on the current state of research on gustation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Feb;12(2):210-216. doi: 10.1002/alr.22902. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022. PMID: 34704387 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Long COVID, the Brain, Nerves, and Cognitive Function.Neurol Int. 2023 Jul 6;15(3):821-841. doi: 10.3390/neurolint15030052. Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 37489358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Alterations in smell or taste in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of Omicron variant dominance.Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;128:278-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 16. Int J Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36657518 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with and without chemosensory disorders at disease onset: a psychophysical and magnetic resonance imaging exploratory study.Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2409-2418. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07429-4. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Neurol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38441790 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory and neurological outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 from acute infection to recovery.Front Allergy. 2022 Oct 26;3:1019274. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1019274. eCollection 2022. Front Allergy. 2022. PMID: 36389036 Free PMC article.
-
The Correlation between the Results of the Sniffin' Sticks Test, Demographic Data, and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders in a Hungarian Population after a SARS-CoV-2 Infection.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1041. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031041. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36769688 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Xydakis MS, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Holbrook EH, et al. . Smell and taste dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:1015-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30293-0 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30293-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Trecca E, Marano PG, Gelardi M, et al. . Is 2020 the golden year of otolaryngology research? The impact of COVID-19 on the Italian academic production. Acta Biomed 2021;92:e2021207. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92i2.11557 10.23750/abm.v92i2.11557 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chillakuru YR, Gerhard EF, Shim T, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 on otolaryngology literature. Laryngoscope 2021. Oct 8:10.1002/lary.29902. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29902. Epub ahead of print. 10.1002/lary.29902 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Zocchi J, Pietrobon G, Moretto S, et al. . Literature in the time of COVID-19: the “phase two.” Oral Oncol 2020. Jun 3;109:104837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104837. Epub ahead of print. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104837 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vaira LA, Salzano G, Deiana G, et al. . Anosmia and ageusia: common findings in COVID-19 patients. Laryngoscope 2020;130:1787. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28692 10.1002/lary.28692 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous