Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;46(6):2769-2780.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02974-9. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

Maarten J Ottenhof  1   2   3   4 , Inge J Veldhuizen  5 , Lusanne J V Hensbergen  5 , Louise L Blankensteijn  5 , Wichor Bramer  6 , Berend Vd Lei  7 , Maarten M Hoogbergen  5 , René R W J Hulst  8 , Chris J Sidey-Gibbons  9
Affiliations
Review

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

Maarten J Ottenhof et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: In the past decade there has been an increasing interest in the field of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which are now commonly used alongside traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity and mortality. Since the FACE-Q Aesthetic development in 2010, it has been widely used in clinical practice and research, measuring the quality of life and patient satisfaction. It quantifies the impact and change across different aspects of cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. We review how researchers have utilized the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to date, and aim to understand better whether and how it has enhanced our understanding and practice of aesthetic facial procedures.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature. Publications that used the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to evaluate patient outcomes were included. Publications about the development of PROMs or modifications of the FACE-Q Aesthetic, translation or validation studies of the FACE-Q Aesthetic scales, papers not published in English, reviews, comments/discussions, or letters to the editor were excluded.

Results: Our search produced 1189 different articles; 70 remained after applying in- and exclusion criteria. Significant findings and associations were further explored. The need for evidence-based patient-reported outcome caused a growing uptake of the FACE-Q Aesthetic in cosmetic surgery and dermatology an increasing amount of evidence concerning facelift surgery, botulinum toxin, rhinoplasty, soft tissue fillers, scar treatments, and experimental areas.

Discussion: The FACE-Q Aesthetic has been used to contribute substantial evidence about the outcome from the patient perspective in cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. The FACE-Q Aesthetic holds great potential to improve quality of care and may fundamentally change the way we measure success in plastic surgery and dermatology.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The FACE-Q is owned by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The FACE-Q can be used free of charge for non-profit purposes (e.g., clinicians, researchers, and students). The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of article selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of articles using the FACE-Q Aesthetic by year
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Plastic surgery statistics. In: American society of plastic surgeons. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics. Accessed 10 Feb 2020
    1. Cosmetic surgery stats: number of surgeries remains stable amid calls for greater regulation of quick fix solutions.| The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. https://baaps.org.uk/media/press_releases/1708/cosmetic_surgery_stats_nu.... Accessed 10 Feb 2020
    1. Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1819–1827. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, De Vet HCW. Development of a methodological pubmed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1115–1123. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, et al. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in endnote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:240–243. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed