Evaluation of clinical efficacy of continuous care with improved insulin injection techniques on patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 35766039
- PMCID: PMC9247381
- DOI: 10.1177/03000605221108047
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of continuous care with improved insulin injection techniques on patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of continuous care with improved insulin injection techniques on patients with diabetes mellitus.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with diabetes mellitus. They were randomly assigned to a control or observation group. Patients in the control group received conventional continuous nursing. Patients in the observation group were given optimized insulin injection education and continuous nursing on the same basis as the conventional nursing used in the control group. Blood glucose-related outcomes, knowledge of insulin injections and adverse events were recorded.
Results: A total of 96 patients with diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study (n = 48 per group). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Compared with the control group, continuous care combined with optimized insulin injection techniques significantly reduced blood glucose target time, fasting blood glucose, 2-h postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c. The proportions of patients reporting a subcutaneous mass, insulin leakage and hypoglycaemic events were significantly lower in the observation group; and pain scores were significantly reduced compared with the control group.
Conclusions: Continuous care and optimization of insulin injection techniques can help patients achieve better diabetes-related outcomes.Study Registration Number: ChiCTR2200057166.
Keywords: Continuity care; clinical efficacy; diabetes; insulin injection techniques.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
Injection of acidic or neutral insulin and pain: a single-center, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Clin Ther. 2006 Dec;28(12):2094-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.017. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 17296465 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection regimens in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.BMJ. 2019 Apr 3;365:l1226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1226. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30944112 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.Drugs. 2002;62(13):1945-81. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262130-00014. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12215068 Review.
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
-
Impact of technology on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials on continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Dec;21(12):2619-2625. doi: 10.1111/dom.13845. Epub 2019 Sep 13. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019. PMID: 31368658
References
-
- Nanayakkara N, Ranasinha S, Gadowski A, et al.. Age, age at diagnosis and diabetes duration are all associated with vascular complications in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2018; 32: 279–290. - PubMed
-
- Viigimaa M, Sachinidis A, Toumpourleka M, et al.. Macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2020; 18: 110–116. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous