Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):647-654.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005507. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

Intentional Watch and Wait or Organ Preservation Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Consolidation CAPEOX for MRI-defined Low-risk Rectal Cancer: Findings From a Prospective Phase 2 Trial (PKUCH-R01 Trial, NCT02860234)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Intentional Watch and Wait or Organ Preservation Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Consolidation CAPEOX for MRI-defined Low-risk Rectal Cancer: Findings From a Prospective Phase 2 Trial (PKUCH-R01 Trial, NCT02860234)

Lin Wang et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of intentional watch and wait (W&W) and organ preservation surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation CAPEOX in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined low-risk rectal cancer.

Background: Clinical T2/early T3 rectal cancers can achieve high yield pathological complete response (ypCR) rates after chemoradiotherapy; thus, an intentional W&W or organ preservation strategy for good clinical responders in these subgroups can be further tested.

Methods: This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolled patients with low-risk MRI prestaged rectal cancers, who concurrently received chemoradiation, followed by four 3-weekly cycles of CAPEOX regimen. Following reassessment, clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR patients underwent W&W/organ preservation surgery; the primary endpoint was a 3-year organ preservation rate.

Results: Of the 64 participants, 58 completed treatment, with 6.4% and 33.9% grade 3 to 4 toxicities in the radiotherapy and consolidation CAPEOX phases, respectively, during a median 39.5-month follow-up. Initial cCR, and non-cCR occurred in 33, 13, and 18 patients, respectively. Of the 31 cCR and 7 near-cCR cases managed by W&W, local regrowth occurred in 7; of these, 6 received salvage surgery. The estimated 2-year local regrowth rates were 12.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1%-24.7%] in cCR and 42.9% (95% CI: 6.2%-79.6%) in near-cCR cases, respectively. Eight patients received local excision, including 2 with regrowth salvage. Lung metastases occurred in 3 patients and multiple metastasis occurred in 1 patient; no local recurrence occurred. The estimated 3-year organ preservation rate was 67.2% (95% CI: 55.6%-78.8%). The estimated 3-year cancer-specific survival, non-regrowth disease-free survival, and stoma-free survival were 96.6% (95% CI: 92.1%-100%), 92.2% (95% CI: 85.5%-98.9%), and 82.7% (95% CI: 73.5%-91.9%), respectively.

Conclusions: Chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation CAPEOX for MRI-defined low-risk rectal cancer can lead to high rates of organ preservation through intentional W&W or local excision. The oncologic safety of this strategy should be further tested.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02860234.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall consort flow diagram to show patient recruitment, initial response, tailored treatment, and organ preservation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Typical images of baseline MRI, restaging MRI, and endoscopic features of patients with different responses, assessed by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center criteria through MDT discussion at Peking University Cancer Hospital. A1–A3: One cCR case treated with W&W, without regrowth; A1, baseline mrT3a tumor; A2, minimal hypointense fibrosis confined in the rectal wall by restaging MRI; A3, typical endoscopic view of cCR with significant flat/whitening mucosa and telangiectasia. B1–B3: One near-cCR case treated with W&W, without regrowth; B1, baseline mrT3a tumor; B2, mostly full-thickness hypointense fibrosis confined in the rectal wall by restaging MRI; B3, typical endoscopic view of near-cCR with minor mucosal abnormality and mild erythema. C1–C3: One non-cCR case treated with LAR; C1, baseline mrT3a tumor; C2, intermediate signal in fibrosis beyond the rectal wall; C3, macroscopic view of palpable ulcerative lesion in rectum specimen. D1–D3: One near-cCR case treated with LE, without local recurrence; D1, baseline mrT3b tumor; D2, mostly hypointense signal in fibrosis, slightly beyond the rectal wall; C3, macroscopic view of the specimen after pyramid LE with partial mesorectum. Pathology revealed ypT2 tumor with negative radial and deep margins. E1–E3: One cCR case with regrowth treated with LE without local recurrence; E1, baseline mrT2 tumor; E2, MRI features of regrowth, intermediate signal in fibrosis confined in the rectal wall; E3, endoscopic view of regrowth (by narrow-band imaging), visible intraluminal lesion with positive biopsy. Pathology revealed ypT2 tumor with negative radial and deep margins.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The KM curve of local regrowth in cCR/near-cCR cases following W&W. The estimated 2-year local regrowth rates were 12.9% (95% CI: 1.1%–24.7%) in cCR, 42.9% (95% CI: 6.2%–79.6%) in near-cCR cases, and 18.4% (95% CI: 6.1%–30.7%) in cCR/near-cCR cases.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The KM curves of TME-free survival, NR-DFS, and stoma-free survival. The estimated 3-year OPR is 67.2% (95% CI: 55.6%–78.8%), NR-DFS is 92.2% (95% CI: 85.5%–98.9%), and stoma-free survival is 82.7% (95% CI: 73.5%–91.9%).

References

    1. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, et al. . Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373:811–820. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. . Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:575–582. - PubMed
    1. van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, et al. . Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2018;391:2537–2545. - PubMed
    1. Chadi SA, Malcomson L, Ensor J, et al. . Factors affecting local regrowth after watch and wait for patients with a clinical complete response following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer (InterCoRe consortium): an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:825–836. - PubMed
    1. Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, et al. . Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:174–183. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data