Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using the INBONE II Prosthesis
- PMID: 35766416
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01240
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using the INBONE II Prosthesis
Abstract
Background: The literature on the outcome of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains limited. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision TAA at a high-volume center in the United Kingdom.
Methods: This study was a retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent 29 revision TAAs using the INBONE II Total Ankle System (Wright Medical Technology/Stryker). Demographic, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure data were analyzed.
Results: The mean duration from primary TAA to revision was 87.5 months (range, 16 to 223 months). The main indication for the revision was aseptic loosening after the primary TAA (83%). Additional procedures were required in 76% of ankles. At a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 24 to 60 months), the infection rate was 7%, the reoperation rate was 7%, and the implant survival rate was 97%. A significant postoperative improvement in the radiographic component alignment measures was observed. The subsidence, loosening, and heterotopic ossification rates in this study were comparable with those in other reports and did not influence the clinical outcome. A significant improvement was observed in the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in all domains and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in 3 domains at 24 months postoperatively.
Conclusions: Revision TAA using the INBONE II prosthesis was associated with good short-term survival and improvement in postoperative scores at 2 years. Maintenance of the postoperatively improved alignment was documented at the follow-up. The results of this study support the notion that revision TAA is a satisfactory option for failed primary TAA.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H124 ).
Comment in
-
Failed Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Our Expanding Shoreline of Peril: Commentary on an article by Bakur A. Jamjoom, BMBS, MCh, FRCS, et al.: "Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using the INBONE II Prosthesis".J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Sep 7;104(17):e78. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00764. Epub 2022 Sep 7. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022. PMID: 36069802 No abstract available.
References
-
- Adams SB Jr, Demetracopoulos CA, Queen RM, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):1983-9.
-
- Kamrad I, Carlsson Å, Henricson A, Magnusson H, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE. Good outcome scores and high satisfaction rate after primary total ankle replacement. Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec;88(6):675-80.
-
- Koivu H, Kohonen I, Mattila K, Loyttyniemi E, Tiusanen H. Long-term results of Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Jul;38(7):723-31.
-
- Lewis JS Jr, Green CL, Adams SB Jr, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA. Comparison of first- and second-generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty using a modular intramedullary tibial component. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Aug;36(8):881-90.
-
- Scott RT, Witt BL, Hyer CF. Design comparison of the INBONE I versus INBONE II total ankle system. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Apr;6(2):137-40.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
