Support for health care workers and psychological distress: thinking about now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 35766916
- PMCID: PMC9584174
- DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.42.10.01
Support for health care workers and psychological distress: thinking about now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Introduction: This study explores the relationship between emotional support, perceived risk and mental health outcomes among health care workers, who face high rates of burnout and mental distress since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A cross-sectional, multicentred online survey of health care workers in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic evaluated coping strategies, confidence in infection control, impact of previous work during the 2003 SARS outbreak and emotional support. Mental health outcomes were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, the Impact of Event Scale - Revised and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
Results: Of 3852 participants, 8.2% sought professional mental health services while 77.3% received emotional support from family, 74.0% from friends and 70.3% from colleagues. Those who felt unsupported in their work had higher odds ratios of experiencing moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84-2.69), PTSD (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.58-2.25) and depression (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.57-2.25). Nearly 40% were afraid of telling family about the risks they were exposed to at work. Those who were able to share this information demonstrated lower risk of anxiety (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48-0.69), PTSD (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41-0.56) and depression (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.47-0.65).
Conclusion: Informal sources of support, including family, friends and colleagues, play an important role in mitigating distress and should be encouraged and utilized more by health care workers.
Introduction: Cette étude explore la relation entre le soutien émotionnel, le risque perçu et les résultats en matière de santé mentale chez les travailleurs de la santé, qui font face à des taux élevés d’épuisement professionnel et de détresse mentale depuis le début de la pandémie de COVID-19.
Méthodologie: Une enquête transversale a été menée en ligne au cours de la première vague de la pandémie de COVID-19 auprès de travailleurs de la santé de divers centres de la région du Grand Toronto (Ontario, Canada) pour évaluer les stratégies d’adaptation, la confiance dans les mesures de lutte contre les infections, l’impact du travail antérieur lors de l’épidémie de SRAS survenue en 2003 et le soutien émotionnel. Les résultats en matière de santé mentale ont été évalués au moyen de l’échelle du trouble d’anxiété généralisée (GAD-7), de l’échelle d’impact des événements – révisée (IES-R) et du questionnaire sur la santé des patients (PHQ-9).
Résultats: Sur les 3 852 participants, 8,2 % ont eu recours à des services professionnels en santé mentale, 77,3 % ont reçu du soutien émotionnel de la part de membres de leur famille, 74,0 % de la part d’amis et 70,3 % de la part de collègues. Les personnes qui ne se sont pas senties soutenues dans leur travail présentaient des probabilités plus élevées d’éprouver des symptômes d’anxiété modérés et sévères (rapport de cotes [RC] = 2,23; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 1,84 à 2,69), de trouble de stress post-traumatique (TSPT) (RC = 1,88; IC à 95 % : 1,58 à 2,25) et de dépression (RC = 1,88; IC à 95 % : 1,57 à 2,25). Près de 40 % avaient peur de parler à leur famille des risques auxquels ils étaient exposés au travail. Ceux qui ont pu partager cette information faisaient état d’un risque plus faible d’anxiété (RC = 0,58; IC à 95 % : 0,48 à 0,69), de TSPT (RC = 0,48; IC à 95 % : 0,41 à 0,56) et de dépression (RC = 0,55; IC à 95 % : 0,47 à 0,65).
Conclusion: Les sources informelles de soutien, en particulier la famille, les amis et les collègues, jouent un rôle important dans l’atténuation de la détresse et devraient être encouragées et utilisées davantage par les travailleurs de la santé.
Keywords: PTSD; anxiety; burnout; depression; health care workers; infection control; mental health; posttraumatic stress disorder; psychological support; support.
Plain language summary
Health care workers mainly used informal sources of emotional support such as family, friends and colleagues during the current COVID-19 pandemic, with fewer seeking support from mental health professionals. Those health care workers who felt confident about the effectiveness of infection control measures, and particularly organizational policies, reported less overall distress. Health care workers who felt supported had reduced rates of hypnotic medication and alcohol use. Feelings of anxiety may have affected health care workers’ ability to share information with their families about their risk of contracting COVID-19 at work.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Surviving SARS and living through COVID-19: Healthcare worker mental health outcomes and insights for coping.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0258893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258893. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34758047 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intensive care unit workers: a nationwide survey.Can J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;69(4):472-484. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02175-z. Epub 2021 Dec 23. Can J Anaesth. 2022. PMID: 34940952 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of burnout and psychological distress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a 1-year observational study.BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04457-2. BMC Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36539718 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0246454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246454. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33690641 Free PMC article.
-
Mental health status and related factors influencing healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0289454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289454. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38241316 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ten areas for ICU clinicians to be aware of to help retain nurses in the ICU.Crit Care. 2022 Oct 13;26(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04182-y. Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 36229859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anxiety and stress among Vietnamese health workers during the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: a cross-sectional study.J Med Life. 2024 Oct;17(10):940-947. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0275. J Med Life. 2024. PMID: 39720168 Free PMC article.
-
Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Post-COVID-19: A Latin American Review and Insights into Personalized Management Strategies.J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 25;14(7):680. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070680. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39063934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychological distress among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: patterns over time.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):1214. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11577-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39390447 Free PMC article.
-
The drivers of mental health service utilisation among public primary healthcare workers in Negeri Sembilan.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0317654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317654. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39888868 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chew QH, Wei KC, Vasoo S, Sim K, et al. Psychological and coping responses of health care workers toward emerging infectious disease outbreaks. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81((6)):20r13450. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous