Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome
- PMID: 35766998
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.16238
Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome
Abstract
Aim: Pelvic exenteration (PE) has become the standard of care for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The high short-term morbidity reported from this procedure is well established; however, longer term complications of such radical surgery and their management have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, indications and outcomes of long-term (more than 90-day) reoperative surgery in this group of patients, with a focus on the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS).
Methods: Clinical data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, with additional data pertaining to indications, operative details and outcomes of reoperative surgery obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if reoperative surgery was endoscopic or radiologically guided, was for the investigation or treatment of recurrent disease, or was clearly unrelated to previous surgery.
Results: Of 716 patients who underwent PE, 75 (11%) required 101 reoperative abdominal or perineal procedures, 52 (51%) of which were in 40 (6%) patients for complications of EPS. This group were more likely to have undergone a total PE (65% vs. 43%; P < 0.01) with either major bony (70% vs. 50%; P < 0.01) and/or nerve (40% vs. 25%; P = 0.03) resections at index exenteration. The patho-anatomy, surgical management and outcomes of these patients are described herein, considering separately complications of entero-cutaneous fistula, entero-perineal fistula, small bowel obstruction and local management of perineal wound complications.
Conclusion: Six per cent of PE patients will require re-intervention for the management of EPS. Reliable strategies for preventing EPS remain elusive; however, surgical management is feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes with the optimum strategy to be selected on an individual patient basis.
Keywords: empty pelvis syndrome; pelvic exenteration.
© 2022 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Venchiarutti RL, Solomon MJ, Koh CE, Young JM, Steffens D. Pushing the boundaries of pelvic exenteration by maintaining survival at the cost of morbidity. Br J Surg. 2019;106(10):1393-403.
-
- Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Young JM, Koh C, Venchiarutti RL, Lee P, et al. Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenteration. BJS Open. 2018;2(5):328-35.
-
- Platt E, Dovell G, Smolarek S. Systematic review of outcomes following pelvic exenteration for the treatment of primary and recurrent locally advanced rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(11):835-45.
-
- Solomon MJ, Brown KGM. Extended radical resection: the standard of care for patients with advanced pelvic malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(2):323-4.
-
- PelvEx Collaborative. Surgical and survival outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer: results from an international collaboration. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):315-21.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical