Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group
- PMID: 35767103
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11864-y
Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group
Abstract
Background: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS.
Methods: An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Results: Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS.
Conclusions: Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Similar articles
-
Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;30(5):4618-4631. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050349. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37232807 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group.Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7873-7888. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09654-z. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33852100 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Morbidity After Resection of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Report from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG).Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2705-2714. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09445-y. Epub 2021 Jan 2. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33389288
-
Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3531-3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5336-7. Epub 2016 Aug 1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27480354 Free PMC article.
-
Post-relapse outcomes after primary extended resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A report from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;123(11):1971-1978. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30572. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28152173
Cited by
-
Significant Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a Tertiary Center.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4515-4526. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13459-7. Epub 2023 May 9. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37160805
-
The prognostic factors and treatment patterns of the first recurrence of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug;30(8):1641-1649. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02790-6. Epub 2025 May 28. Int J Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40434510
-
Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;30(5):4618-4631. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050349. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37232807 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrated lipidomics and RNA-seq reveal prognostic biomarkers in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.Cancer Cell Int. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12935-024-03585-x. Cancer Cell Int. 2024. PMID: 39696292 Free PMC article.
-
High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):4138-4147. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15074-6. Epub 2024 Feb 23. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38396039 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Porter GA, Baxter NN, Pisters PW. Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, surgery, and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2006;106:1610–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21761 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Houdt WJ, Zaidi S, Messiou C, Thway K, Strauss DC, Jones RL. Treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma: current standards and new developments. Curr Opin Oncol. 2017;29:260–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000377 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dumitra S, Gronchi A. The diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Oncol Williston Park. 2018;32:464–9.
-
- Cananzi FCM, Ruspi L, Sicoli F, Minerva EM, Quagliuolo V. Did outcomes improve in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery? Surg Oncol. 2019;28:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.11.004 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Callegaro D, Raut CP, Ng D, et al. Has the outcome for patients who undergo resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma changed over time? A study of time trends during the past 15 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:1700–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09065-6 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical