Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD015077.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015077.

Early spontaneous breathing for acute respiratory distress syndrome in individuals with COVID-19

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Early spontaneous breathing for acute respiratory distress syndrome in individuals with COVID-19

Friedrich Hohmann et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents the most severe course of COVID-19 (caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), usually resulting in a prolonged stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) and high mortality rates. Despite the fact that most affected individuals need invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), evidence on specific ventilation strategies for ARDS caused by COVID-19 is scarce. Spontaneous breathing during IMV is part of a therapeutic concept comprising light levels of sedation and the avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). This approach is potentially associated with both advantages (e.g. a preserved diaphragmatic motility and an optimised ventilation-perfusion ratio of the ventilated lung), as well as risks (e.g. a higher rate of ventilator-induced lung injury or a worsening of pulmonary oedema due to increases in transpulmonary pressure). As a consequence, spontaneous breathing in people with COVID-19-ARDS who are receiving IMV is subject to an ongoing debate amongst intensivists.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of early spontaneous breathing activity in invasively ventilated people with COVID-19 with ARDS compared to ventilation strategies that avoid spontaneous breathing.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which includes CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials.gov WHO ICTRP, and medRxiv) and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies from their inception to 2 March 2022.

Selection criteria: Eligible study designs comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated spontaneous breathing in participants with COVID-19-related ARDS compared to ventilation strategies that avoided spontaneous breathing (e.g. using NMBA or deep sedation levels). Additionally, we considered controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series with comparison group, prospective cohort studies and retrospective cohort studies. For these non-RCT studies, we considered a minimum total number of 50 participants to be compared as necessary for inclusion. Prioritised outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinical improvement or worsening, quality of life, rate of (serious) adverse events and rate of pneumothorax. Additional outcomes were need for tracheostomy, duration of ICU length of stay and duration of hospitalisation.

Data collection and analysis: We followed the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two review authors independently screened all studies at the title/abstract and full-text screening stage. We also planned to conduct data extraction and risk of bias assessment in duplicate. We planned to conduct meta-analysis for each prioritised outcome, as well as subgroup analyses of mortality regarding severity of oxygenation impairment and duration of ARDS. In addition, we planned to perform sensitivity analyses for studies at high risk of bias, studies using NMBA in addition to deep sedation level to avoid spontaneous breathing and a comparison of preprints versus peer-reviewed articles. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

Main results: We identified no eligible studies for this review.

Authors' conclusions: We found no direct evidence on whether early spontaneous breathing in SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS is beneficial or detrimental to this particular group of patients. RCTs comparing early spontaneous breathing with ventilatory strategies not allowing for spontaneous breathing in SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS are necessary to determine its value within the treatment of severely ill people with COVID-19. Additionally, studies should aim to clarify whether treatment effects differ between people with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS and people with non-SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04497454 NCT04922814 NCT05248243.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FH: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

LW: is member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (Nationales Forschungsnetzwerk der Universitätsmedizin (NUM)) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

FG: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is a member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

DS: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

JF: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

MGo: works as an Intensive Care Medicine Consultant and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

MGr: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is a member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

CG: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

CH: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is a member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

AK: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is a member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

MIM: is member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

OM: works as an Intensive Care Medicine Consultant and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

NO: works as an Intensive Care Medicine physician and is member of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

VT: works as an Intensive Care Medicine Consultant and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

AV: works as Information Scientist and Librarian of the University of Leipzig Library (no direct funding).

FF: works as an Intensive Care Medicine Consultant and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

JB: The Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research at the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology is part of the CEOsys project funded by the Network of University Medicine (NUM) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF), grant number 01KX2021, paid to the institution.

SL: works as an Intensive Care Medicine Consultant and is a member of the CEOsys project (no direct funding).

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Agarwal 2013 {published data only}
    1. Agarwal R, Srinivasan A, Aggarwal A, Gupta D. Adaptive support ventilation for complete ventilatory support in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot, randomized controlled trial. Respirology 2013;18(7):1108-15. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Angeles 2020 {published data only}
    1. Angeles G, Zattera L, Sole C, Fernandez A, De Peray C, Benet P, et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 does not differ from other causes of ARDS. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2020;8:139. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00354-8] - DOI
Ball 2021 {published data only}
    1. Ball L, Robba C, Maiello L, Herrmann J, Gerard SE, Xin Y, et al. Computed tomography assessment of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Critical Care 2021;25(1):81. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Becher 2019 {published data only}
    1. Becher T, Adelmeier A, Frerichs I, Weiler N, Schädler D. Adaptive mechanical ventilation with automated minimization of mechanical power – a pilot randomized cross-over study. Critical Care 2019;23:338. [DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2610-7] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bonny 2020 {published data only}
    1. Bonny V, Janiak V, Spadaro S, Pinna A, Demoule A, Dres M. Correction to: effect of PEEP decremental on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, pulmonary regional ventilation, and hemodynamics in patients with SARS-Cov-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care 2020;24(1):675. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Buiteman‐Kruizinga 2020 {published data only}
    1. Buiteman-Kruizinga L, Mkadami H, Schultz M, Heiden P. Effect of fully-automated versus non-automated ventilation on mechanical power of ventilation in COVID-19 – an observational crossover study. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2020;8:150. [DOI: ]
Buiteman‐Kruizinga 2021 {published data only}
    1. Buiteman-Kruizinga L, Mkdami H, Neto A, Kruizinga M, Botta M, Schultz M et al. Effect of INTELLiVENT-ASV versus conventional ventilation on ventilation intensity in patients with COVID-19 ARDS – an observational study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2021;10:5409. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Caley 2021 {published data only}
    1. Caley L, Dinis A, Oliveira T, Neto Real A, Narciso S, Pereira T, et al. Neuromuscular blocking agents in COVID 19 patients. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2021;9:138-9. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-021-00413-8] - DOI
Chelly 2020 {published data only}
    1. Chelly J, Mazerand S, Jochmans S, Weyer CM, Pourcine F, Ellrodt O, et al. Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING). Critical Care 2020;24(1):453. [DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03155-3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Cotton 2021 {published data only}
    1. Cotton S, Husain A, Meehan M, Zawaydeh Q, Malhotra A, Sweeney D. The influence of paralytics on the safety and efficacy of prone positioning in COVID19 ARDS. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2021;203:TP48. [DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2508] - DOI
Courcelle 2020 {published data only}
    1. Courcelle R, Gaudry S, Serck N, Blonz G, Lascarrou JB, Grimaldi D. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter observational study. Critical Care 2020;24(1):446. [DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03164-2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Devlin 2022 {published data only}
    1. Devlin J, Train S, Burns K, Massaro A, Vasseur J, Selvan K, et al. Critical care pharmacist attitudes and perceptions of neuromuscular blocker infusions in ARDS. Critical Care Medicine 2022;50(1):472. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000810124.49603.b5] - DOI
Diniz‐Silva 2020 {published data only}
    1. Diniz-Silva F, Moriya HT, Alencar AM, Amato MB, Carvalho CR, Ferreira JC. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist vs. pressure support to deliver protective mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized crossover trial. Annals of Intensive Care 2020;10(1):18. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Ego 2021 {published data only}
    1. Ego A, Peluso L, Gorham J, Diosdado A, Restuccia G, Creteur J, et al. Use of sedatives and neuromuscular-blocking agents in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Microorganisms 2021;9(11):2393. [DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112393] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Esnault 2020 {published data only}
    1. Esnault P, Cardinale M, Hraiech S, Goutorbe P, Baumstrack K, Prud'homme E, et al. High respiratory drive and excessive respiratory efforts predict relapse of respiratory failure in critically ill patients with COVID-19. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2020;202(8):1173-8. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1582LE] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gainnier 2004 {published data only}
    1. Gainnier M, Roch A, Forel JM, Thirion X, Arnal JM, Donati S, et al. Effect of neuromuscular blocking agents on gas exchange in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care Medicine 2004;32(1):113-9. [DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104114.72614.BC] - DOI - PubMed
Gao 2022 {published data only}
    1. Gao Z, Li C, Chen H, Xie J, Liu L, Yang Y. A meta-analysis of the effect of neuromuscular blocking agents on oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome [肌松剂对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者氧合影响的Meta分析]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2022;61(1):86-94. [DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20210114-00036] - DOI - PubMed
Groetzinger 2016 {published data only}
    1. Groetzinger LM, Rivosecchi RM, Kane-Gill SL, Donahoe MP. Association between train-of-four values and gas exchange indices in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2016;50(12):1009-15. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Guervilly 2017 {published data only}
    1. Guervilly C, Bisbal M, Forel JM, Mechati M, Lehingue S, Bourenne J, et al. Effects of neuromuscular blockers on transpulmonary pressures in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine 2017;43(3):408-18. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4653-4] - DOI - PubMed
Ingebrigtson 2021 {published data only}
    1. Ingebrigtson M, Farina N, Miller J, Renius K, McSparron J, Kenes M. Cisatracurium dosing requirements in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2021 Oct 21 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1177/08971900211052835] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Jain 2021 {published data only}covidwho‐1193852
    1. Jain S, Londono C, Uribe-Marquez S, Nowak K. Conventional protective LTV versus APRV for patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Critical Care Medicine 2021;49(1):68. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000726548.79729.74] [EMBASE: covidwho-1193852] - DOI
Kallet 2018 {published data only}
    1. Kallet RH, Zhuo H, Yip V, Gomez A, Lipnick MS. Spontaneous breathing trials and conservative sedation practices reduce mechanical ventilation duration in subjects with ARDS. Respiratory Care 2018;63(1):1-10. [DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05270] - DOI - PubMed
Karayiannis 2021 {published data only}
    1. Karayiannis D, Maragkouli A, Mikropoulos T, Sarri A, Kanavou A, Katsagoni C, et al. Neuromuscular blockade administration is associated with altered energy expenditure in critically ill intubated patients with COVID-19. Clinical Nutrition 25 May 2021 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.05.009] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Knafelj 2021 {published data only}
    1. Knafelj R, Noc M. Can we use adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in COVID-19? Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2021:154-5. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-021-00413-8] - DOI
Kressin 2021 {published data only}
    1. Kressin C, Thompson Bastin M, Ather A, Gopinath A, Srour H, Schadler A, et al. Cisatracurium continuous infusion versus no neuromuscular blockade for acute respiratory distress syndrome on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2021;61(11):1415-20. [DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1933] - DOI - PubMed
Lee 2022 {published data only}
    1. Lee B, Lee S, Baek M, Baek A, Na Y, Kim J, et al. Lower driving pressure and neuromuscular blocker use are associated with decreased mortality in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Respiratory Care 2022;67(2):216-26. [DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09577] - DOI - PubMed
Li 2017 {published data only}
    1. Li J, Luo Z, Li X, Huang Z, Han J, Li Z, et al. Effect of different transpulmonary pressures guided mechanical ventilation on respiratory and hemodynamics of patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2017;29(1):39-44. [DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.01.009] - DOI - PubMed
Li Bassi 2021 {published data only}
    1. Li Bassi G, Gibbons K, Suen J, Dalton H, White N, Corley A et al. Use of neuromuscular blocking agents in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID‑19: a propensity score analysis. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 29 Sep 2021 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-021-00413-8] - DOI
Lyu 2014 {published data only}
    1. Lyu G, Wang X, Jiang W, Cai T, Zhang Y. Clinical study of early use of neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2014;26(5):325-9. [DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.05.008] - DOI - PubMed
Mauri 2020 {published data only}
    1. Mauri T, Spinelli E, Scotti E, Colussi G, Basile M, Crotti S et al. Potential for lung recruitment and ventilation-perfusion mismatch in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome from coronavirus disease 2019. Critical Care Medicine 2020;48(8):1129-34. [DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004386] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
McCue 2020 {published data only}
    1. McCue C, Norman S, Macdonald C, Cowan R. Inflammatory response trajectory is associated with increased failure to wean neuromuscular blockade in ventilated COVID-19 patients. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2020:463. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00354-8] - DOI
Needham 2012 {published data only}
    1. Needham CJ, Brindley PG. Best evidence in critical care medicine: the role of neuromuscular blocking drugs in early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2012;59(1):105-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12630-011-9615-2] - DOI - PubMed
Papazian 2010 {published data only}
    1. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363(12):1107-16. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372] - DOI - PubMed
Perinkulam Sathyanarayanan 2021 {published data only}
    1. Perinkulam Sathyanarayanan S, Hamid K, Hamza M, Jamous F. Airway pressure release ventilation use in COVID-19 ARDS: a single-center observational study. Chest 2021;160(4):1089-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.1005] - DOI
Renes 2020 {published data only}
    1. Renes M, Nijsten M. Muscle relaxation does not reduce CO2 production in mechanically ventilated COVID patients. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2020:572. [PMID: 10.1186/s40635-020-00354-8] - DOI
Rizvi 2021 {published data only}
    1. Rizvi G, Yamane D, Davidson D, Williams J, Heinz E. Sedation, narcotic and neuromuscular blockade in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2021;39:19-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.06.001] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Rodrigo Castroviejo 2021 {published data only}
    1. Rodrigo Castroviejo N, Ferrigno G, Madrid Romero V, Bektran Bernaldez R, Sanmartino Gonzales C, Berenguer Rodriguez M, et al. ARDS in SARS‑COV2 pneumonia: adjuvant measures of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2021:131. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-021-00413-8] - DOI
Ruan 2021 {published data only}
    1. Ruan E, Gong M, Chen J. Spontaneous awakening trials in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and how increased compliance impacts clinical outcomes. In: American Thoracic Society International Conference Abstracts. 2021:TP048. [DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2522] - DOI
Sella 2020 {published data only}
    1. Sella N, Zarantonello F, Andreatta G, Gagliardi V, Boscolo A, Navalesi P. Positive end-expiratory pressure titration in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: electrical impedance tomography vs. PEEP/FiO2 tables. Critical Care 2020;24(1):540. [DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03242-5] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Serrano 2020 {published data only}
    1. Serrano C, Ruiz Garcia A, Higuera Lucas J, Tato J, Vaduva C, Arteaga J, et al. Factors associated to mortality in COVID 19 patients on mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2020:142-3. [PMID: 10.1186/s40635-020-00354-8] - DOI
Song 2016 {published data only}
    1. Song S, Tian H, Yang X, Hu Z. The clinical effect of airway pressure release ventilation for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2016;28(1):15-21. [DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.01.004] - DOI - PubMed
Tsolaki 2020 {published data only}
    1. Tsolaki V, Siempos I, Magira E, Kokkoris S, Zakynthinos GE, Zakynthinos S. PEEP levels in COVID-19 pneumonia. Critical Care 2020;24(1):303. [DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03049-4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
van der Zee 2020 {published data only}
    1. Zee P, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. Electrical impedance tomography for positive end-expiratory pressure titration in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2020;202(2):280-4. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0816LE] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Villar 2006 {published data only}
    1. Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Pérez-Méndez L, Aguirre-Jaime A. A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine 2006;34(5):1311-8. [DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01] - DOI - PubMed
Vine 2021 {published data only}
    1. Vine J, Soloveichik V, Vinepinsky E, Nini A, Nevo A, Borohovitz A, et al. Airway pressure release ventilation vs low tidal volume ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2021:189-90. [DOI: 10.1186/s40635-021-00413-8] - DOI
Wongtangman 2021 {published data only}
    1. Wongtangman K, Santer P, Wachtendorf L, Azimaraghi O, Baedorf Kassis E, Teja B. Association of sedation, coma, and in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Critical Care Medicine 2021;49(9):1524-34. [DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005053] - DOI - PubMed
Wu 2021 {published data only}
    1. Wu F, Li M, Zhang Z, Shang J, Guo Y, Li Y. Sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation during VV-ECMO therapy in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2): a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Frontiers in Medicine 2021;8:762740. [DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762740] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Zhou 2017 {published data only}
    1. Zhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, Wang P, Yang Y, Liang G, et al. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine 2017;43:1648-59. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ziehr 2020 {published data only}
    1. Ziehr DR, Alladina J, Petri CR, Maley JH, Moskowitz A, Medoff BD, et al. Respiratory pathophysiology of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a cohort study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2020;201(12):1560-4. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1163LE] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Zorbas 2021 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Airway pressure release ventilation for mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 in Western Australian intensive care units: an observational study. pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/re... (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [ANZCTR: ictrp-ACTRN12620000474954]
    1. Zorbas J, Ho K, Litton E, Wibrow B, Fysh E, Anstey M. Airway pressure release ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study. Acute and Critical Care 2021;36(2):143-50. [DOI: 10.4266/acc.2021.00017] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

ictrp‐RBR‐2z3f7k {published data only}
    1. ictrp-RBR-2z3f7k. Artificial ventilation setting in patients infected with COVID-19. pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/re... (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY PLATFORM: ictrp-RBR-2z3f7k]
IRCT20150724023314N4 {published data only}
    1. IRCT20150724023314N4. The effect of APRV-LTV mechanical ventilation mode on arterial blood gases, ventilation indices and vital signs in patients with COVID-19. www.irct.ir/trial/57913 (first received 4 September 2021). [IRANIAN REGISTRY OF CLINICAL TRIALS: IRCT20150724023314N4]
NCT04386369 {published data only}
    1. NCT04386369. Evaluation of airway pressure release ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS (APRV-COVID19). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04386369 (first received 13 May 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04386369]
NCT04399317 {published data only}
    1. NCT04399317. Flow controlled ventilation in ARDS associated with COVID-19. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399317 (first received 22 May 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04399317]
NCT04411459 {published data only}
    1. NCT04411459. Risk factors for prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04411459 (first received 2 June 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04411459]
NCT04459533 {published data only}
    1. NCT04459533. Sparing in neuromuscular blockade in COVID 19 ICU (TOF-COVID). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04459533 (first received 7 July 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04459533]
NCT04486729 {published data only}
    1. NCT04486729. Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange characteristics in patient with SARS-CoV-2. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04486729 (first received 27 July 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04486729]
NCT04497454 {published data only}
    1. NCT04497454. Mechanical ventilation strategy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04497454 (first received 4 August 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04497454]
NCT04922814 {unpublished data only}
    1. NCT04922814. Comparison for the effect of neuromuscular blocking agents versus sedation alone on severe ARDS patients due to COVID-19. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04922814 (first received 11 June 2021). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04922814]
NCT05248243 {published data only}
    1. NCT05248243. Recruitment assessment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and Covid-19. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05248243 (first received 21 February 2022). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05248243]

Additional references

Alhazzani 2020a
    1. Alhazzani W, Belley-Cote E, Møller M, Angus D, Papazain L, Arabi Y, et al. Neuromuscular blockade in patients with ARDS: a rapid practice guideline. Intensive Care Medicine 2020;46:1977-86. [DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06227-8] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Alhazzani 2020b
    1. Alhazzani W, Møller M, Arabi Y, Loeb M, Ng Gong M, Fan E, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Critical Care Medicine 2020;48(6):e440-69. [DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ansems 2021
    1. Ansems K, Grundeis F, Dahms K, Mikolajewska A, Thieme V, Piechotta V, et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 8. Art. No: CD014962. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014962] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Aslam 2021
    1. Aslam TN, Klitgaard TL, Hofsø K, Rasmussen BS, Laake JH. Spontaneous versus controlled mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Current Anesthesiology Reports 2021;11:85-91. - PMC - PubMed
Bain 2021
    1. Bain W, Yang H, Shah F, Suber T, Drohan C, Al-Yousif N, et al. COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison of demographics, physiologic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, and clinical outcomes. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2021;18(7):1202-10. - PMC - PubMed
Bellani 2016
    1. Bellani G, Laffey J, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. Journal of the American Medical Association 2016;315:788-800. - PubMed
Botta 2021
    1. Botta M, Tsonas A, Pillay J, Boers L, Algera A, Bos L, et al. Ventilation management and clinical outcomes in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 (PRoVENT-COVID): a national, multicentre, observational cohort study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2021;9:139-48. - PMC - PubMed
Buitrago‐Garcia 2020
    1. Buitrago-Garcia D, Egli-Gany D, Counotte MJ, Hossmann S, Imeri H, Ipekci Aziz M, et al. Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 2020;17(9):e1003346. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
CEOsys 2021
    1. CEOsys. German COVID-19 evidence-ecosystem. www.covid-evidenz.de (accessed 31 August 2021).
Chai 2020
    1. Chai KL, Valk SJ, Piechotta V, Kimber C, Monsef I, Doree C, et al. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 7. Art. No: CD013600. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
COMET 2021
    1. COMET. Core outcome set developers’ response to COVID-19 (April 2021). www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1538 (accessed 7 September 2021).
Cummings 2020
    1. Cummings M, Baldwin M, Abrams D, Jacobson S, Meyer B, Balough E, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10239):1763-70. - PMC - PubMed
Deeks 2021
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2.
ECDC 2020
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid increase of a SARS-CoV-2 variant with multiple spike protein mutations observed in the United Kingdom, 2020. www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/SARS-CoV-2-variant-mult... (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [URL: www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/SARS-CoV-2-variant-mult...]
Ferrando 2020
    1. Ferrando C, Suarez-Sipmann F, Mellado-Artigas R, Hernández M, Gea A, Arruti E, et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS. Intensive Care Medicine 2020;46:2200-11. - PMC - PubMed
Fichtner 2018
    1. Fichtner F, Mörer O, Laudi S, Weber-Carstens S, Nothacker M, Kaisers U. Clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory insufficiency. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2018;115(50):840-7. - PMC - PubMed
Fichtner 2019
    1. Fichtner F, Mörer O, Weber-Carstens S, Nothacker M, Kaisers U, Laudi S. Clinical guideline for treating acute respiratory insufficiency with invasive ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: evidence based recommendations for choosing modes and setting parameters of mechanical ventilation. Respiration 2019;98:357-72. [DOI: 10.1159/000502157] - DOI - PubMed
Funk 2021
    1. Funk T, Pharris A, Spiteri G, Bundle N, Melidou A, Carr M, et al. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7, B.1.351 or P.1: data from seven EU/EEA countries, weeks 38/2020 to 10/2021. Eurosurveillance 2021;26(16):pii=2100348. [DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.16.2100348] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gottlieb 2022
    1. Gottlieb J, Capetian P, Hamsen U, Janssens W, Karagiannidis C, Kluge S, et al. Oxygen in the acute care of adults: short version of the German S3 guideline. Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 2022;117(1):4-15. [DOI: 10.1007/s00063-021-00884-3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
    1. GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed after 21 December 2020. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). Available at gradepro.org.
Grasselli 2020
    1. Grasselli G, Tonetti T, Protti A, Langer T, Girardis M, Bellani G, et al. Pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre prospective observational study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2020;8(12):1201-8. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2021a
    1. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2.
Higgins 2021b
    1. Higgins JP, Eldridge S, Li T. Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2.
Hirshberg 2018
    1. Hirshberg E, Lanspa M, Peterson J, Carpenter L, Wilson E, Brown S, et al. Randomized feasibility trial of a low tidal volume-airway pressure release ventilation protocol compared with traditional airway pressure release ventilation and volume control ventilation protocols. Critical Care Medicine 2018;46(12):1943-52. - PMC - PubMed
Karagiannidis 2020
    1. Karagiannidis C, Mostert C, Hentschker C, Voshaar T, Malzahn J, Schillinger G, et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2020;8:853-62. [DOI: 10.1016/ S2213-2600(20)30316-7] - PMC - PubMed
Kluge 2021
    1. Kluge S, Janssens U, Welte T, Weber-Carstens S, Schälte G, Spinner C, et al. Recommendations for the therapy of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 [Empfehlungen zur stationären Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19]. www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/113-001LG.html (accessed prior to 18 May 2022).
Kreuzberger 2021
    1. Kreuzberger N, Hirsch C, Chai KL, Piechotta V, Valk SJ, Estcourt LJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 1. Art. No: CD013825. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Kuriyama 2021
    1. Kuriyama A, Jackson J. Neuromuscular blocking agents for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 6. Art. No: CD014693. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014693] - DOI
Lauer 2020
    1. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Annals of Internal Medicine 2020;172(9):577-82. [DOI: 10.7326/M20-0504] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Li 2021
    1. Li T, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Chapter 5: Collecting data. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2.
Marini 2020
    1. Marini J, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. Journal of the American Medical Association 2020;323(22):2329-30. - PubMed
Meyer 2021
    1. Meyer N, Gattinoni L, Calfee C. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet 2021;398(10300):622-37. - PMC - PubMed
Microsoft 2018 [Computer program]
    1. Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Corporation, 2018. Available at office.microsoft.com/excel.
Moher 2009
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000097. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Moss 2019
    1. Moss M, Huang D, Brower R, Ferguson N, Ginde A, Gong M, et al. Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2019;380(21):1997-2008. - PMC - PubMed
Nasa 2021
    1. Nasa P, Azoulay E, Khanna A, Jain R, Gupta S, Javeri Y, et al. Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method. Critical Care 2021;25:106. - PMC - PubMed
NCT01862016
    1. NCT01862016. Early spontaneous breathing in acute respiratory distress syndrome (BiRDS). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01862016 (first received 24 May 2013). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01862016]
NCT04228471
    1. NCT04228471. Early PReserved SPONtaneous breathing activity in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS (PReSPON). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04228471 (first received 14 January 2020). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04228471]
Page 2022
    1. Page MJ, Higgins JP, Sterne JA. Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Papazain 2019
    1. Papazain L, Aubron C, Brochard L, Chiche JD, Combes A, Dreyfuss D, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Annals of Intensive Care 2019;9:69. [DOI: 10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
PHE 2021
    1. Public Health England. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England – Technical briefing 14, 2021. www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-novel-sars-cov-2-var... (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-novel-sars-cov-2-var...]
Potere 2020
    1. Potere N, Valeriani E, Candeloro M, Tana M, Porreca E, Abbate A, et al. A higher mortality rate and long ventilation times differentiate COVID-19 from severe respiratory infections in flu waves [Eine höhere Letalität und lange Beatmungsdauer unterscheiden COVID-19 von schwer verlaufenden Atemwegsinfektionen in Grippewellen]. Critical Care 2020;24(1):389. - PMC - PubMed
Review Manager Web 2021 [Computer program]
    1. Review Manager Web (RevMan Web). Version 3.4.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2021. Available at revman.cochrane.org.
Richardson 2020
    1. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. Journal of the American Medical Association 2020;323(20):2052-9. [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Schilling 2020
    1. Schilling J, Lehfeld AS, Schumacher D, Ullrich A, Diercke M, Buda S, et al. Disease severity of the first COVID-19 wave in Germany using reporting data from the national notification system. Journal of Health Monitoring 2020;5(S11):2-20. [DOI: 10.25646/7170] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Schmidt 2021
    1. Schmidt M, Hajage D, Demoule A, Pham T, Combes A, Dres M, et al. Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine 2021;47(1):60-73. - PMC - PubMed
Schünemann 2021
    1. Schünemann HJ, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, et al. Chapter 14: Completing 'Summary of findings' tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.2.
Sterne 2016
    1. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. - PMC - PubMed
Sterne 2019
    1. Sterne JA, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe N, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898] - DOI - PubMed
Sterne 2020
    1. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Higgins JP. Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6.1.
Struyf 2021
    1. Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Leeflang MM, et al. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19 disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No: CD013665. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Tan 2021
    1. Tan E, Song J, Deane A, Plummer M. Global impact of coronavirus disease 2019 infection requiring admission to the ICU. Chest Journal 2021;159(2):524-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.014] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
The ARDS Definition Task Force 2012
    1. The ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. Journal of the American Medical Association 2012;307(23):2526-33. - PubMed
Tolksdorf 2020
    1. Tolksdorf K, Buda S, Schuler E, Wieler LH, Haas W. Higher lethality and long duration of ventilation distinguish COVID-19 from severe respiratory tract infections in influenza waves. [Eine höhere Letalität und lange Beatmungsdauer unterscheiden COVID-19 von schwer verlaufenden Atemwegsinfektionen in Grippewellen]. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2020;41:3-10. [DOI: 10.25646/7111] - DOI
WHO 2015
    1. World Health Organization. Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. www.who.int/publications/m/item/summary-of-probable-sars-cases-with-onse... (accessed 22 July 2021). [URL: www.who.int/publications/m/item/summary-of-probable-sars-cases-with-onse...]
WHO 2019
    1. World Health Organization. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV). www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en (accessed 22 July 2021). [URL: www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en]
WHO 2020a
    1. World Health Organization. Timeline: WHO's COVID-19 response. www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-time... (accessed 22 July 2021). [URL: www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-time...]
WHO 2020b
    1. World Health Organization. SARS-CoV-2 variants, 2020. www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON305 (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [URL: www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON305]
WHO 2020c
    1. WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characterisation and Management of COVID-19 infection. A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2020;20(8):e192-7. [DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30483-7] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2022a
    1. World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. covid19.who.int (accessed 11 April 2022). [URL: covid19.who.int]
WHO 2022b
    1. World Health Organization. Update on Omicron, 2021. www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2021-update-on-omicron (accessed prior to 18 May 2022). [URL: www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2021-update-on-omicron]
Wu 2020
    1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323(13):1239-42. [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648] - DOI - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Frank 2021
    1. Frank J, Herchenhahn C, Wedekind L, Olbrich N, Hohmann F, Fichtner F, et al. Spontaneous versus mandatory modes in invasively ventilated people with respiratory failure in COVID-19 (part of German Ecosystem CEO-sys), 2021. www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=245089 (accessed 17 May 2022).

Publication types

Substances

Associated data