Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0269433.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269433. eCollection 2022.

The impact of engaging leadership on employee engagement and team effectiveness: A longitudinal, multi-level study on the mediating role of personal- and team resources

Greta Mazzetti  1 , Wilmar B Schaufeli  2   3
Affiliations

The impact of engaging leadership on employee engagement and team effectiveness: A longitudinal, multi-level study on the mediating role of personal- and team resources

Greta Mazzetti et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Most research on the effect of leadership behavior on employees' well-being and organizational outcomes is based on leadership frameworks that are not rooted in sound psychological theories of motivation and are limited to either an individual or organizational levels of analysis. The current paper investigates whether individual and team resources explain the impact of engaging leadership on work engagement and team effectiveness, respectively. Data were collected at two time points on N = 1,048 employees nested within 90 work teams. The Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling results revealed that personal resources (i.e., optimism, resiliency, self-efficacy, and flexibility) partially mediated the impact of T1 individual perceptions of engaging leadership on T2 work engagement. Furthermore, joint perceptions of engaging leadership among team members at T1 resulted in greater team effectiveness at T2. This association was fully mediated by team resources (i.e., performance feedback, trust in management, communication, and participation in decision-making). Moreover, team resources had a significant cross-level effect on individual levels of engagement. In practical terms, training and supporting leaders who inspire, strengthen, and connect their subordinates could significantly improve employees' motivation and involvement and enable teams to pursue their common goals successfully.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The hypothesized multilevel model of engaging leadership.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Standardized path coefficients of the final model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Schaufeli W.B., Salanova M., González-Romá V., Bakker A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002; 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org10.1023/A:1015630930326.
    1. Björk J.M., Bolander P., Forsman A.K. Bottom-up interventions effective in promoting work engagement: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 3754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730421 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzetti G., Robledo E., Vignoli M., Topa G., Guglielmi D., Schaufeli W.B. Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the Job Demands-Resources model. Psychological Reports. 2021; 1–38. doi: 10.1177/00332941211051988 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schaufeli W.B. Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics. 2017; 46(2), 120–132. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008. - DOI
    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007; 22(3), 309–328. 10.1108/02683940710733115. - DOI