Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 29;18(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00322-5.

Primary cold atmospheric plasma combined with low dose cisplatin as a possible adjuvant combination therapy for HNSCC cells-an in-vitro study

Affiliations
Review

Primary cold atmospheric plasma combined with low dose cisplatin as a possible adjuvant combination therapy for HNSCC cells-an in-vitro study

Teresa F Brunner et al. Head Face Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to examine the cytostatic effects of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) on different head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines either in isolation or in combination with low dose cisplatin. The effect of CAP treatment was investigated by using three different HNSCC cell lines (chemo-resistant Cal 27, chemo-sensitive FaDu and OSC 19).

Materials and method: Cell lines were exposed to CAP treatment for 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 s (s). Cisplatin was added concurrently (cc) or 24 h after CAP application (cs). Cell viability, DNA damage and apoptosis was evaluated by dye exclusion, MTT, alkaline microgel electrophoresis assay and Annexin V-Fit-C/PI respectively.

Results: In all cell lines, 120 s of CAP exposure resulted in a significant reduction of cell viability. DNA damage significantly increased after 60 s. Combined treatment of cells with CAP and low dose cisplatin showed additive effects. A possible sensitivity to cisplatin could be restored in Cal 27 cells by CAP application.

Conclusion: CAP shows strong cytostatic effects in HNSCC cell lines that can be increased by concurrent cisplatin treatment, suggesting that CAP may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of low dose cisplatin.

Keywords: Adjuvant combination therapy; Cold atmospheric plasma; Head and neck cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the characteristics of MiniFlatPlaSter® [17]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Photograph of the SMD device (MiniFlatPlaSter®) used in this study [17]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic illustration of the plasma treatment on the different cell types
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cisplatin dose–response curve for Cal 27, FaDu and OSC 19 cells, IC50 and used concentration of 2.5 µM are displayed
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
An example of fluorescence images demonstrating the development of tail DNA after CAP treatment (a) intact DNA and (b) degraded DNA, (horizontal scale bar 100 μm)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(a-b) An exemplary fluorescence microscopy image of Annexin V/PI stained cells (a) green fluorescence showing early apoptotic cells, (b) red fluorescence showing late apoptotic/necrotic cells) (horizontal scale bar 50 µm)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Detection of cell viability (%) with an MTT assay for all three cell types at different CAP treatment times. Line graph is used to present the results (mean and error bars 95% CI is shown for all three cell lines, (for each treatment time per cell type n = 15)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Detection of DNA Damage (comet assay) for all three cell types. Line graph is used to present the results (mean and error bars 95% CI is shown for all three cell lines, (for each treatment time per cell type n = 15)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Detection of apoptotic cells for each cell line (Fig. 9a: Cal 27, Fig. 9b: FaDu, Fig. 9c: OSC 19) after the different CAP exposure times (for each treatment time per cell type n = 15)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Detection of cell viability (%) with an MTT assay for all three cell types after cisplatin treatment. Mean and error bars 95% CI is shown for all three cell lines, (for each treatment time per cell type n = 15)
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Detection of cell viability (%) with an MTT assay for the different treatment types and times for each of the individual cell types and the cisplatin reference value, (Fig. 11a: Cal 27, Fig. 11b: FaDu, Fig. 11c: OSC 19). Line graph is used to present the results (mean and error bars 95% CI is shown for all three cell lines, (for each treatment time per cell type n = 15)

References

    1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. - PubMed
    1. Cooper JS, et al. Precisely defining high-risk operable head and neck tumors based on rtog #85-03 and #88-24: Targets for postoperative radiochemotherapy? Head Neck. 1999;20(7):588–594. - PubMed
    1. Dasari S, Tchounwou PB. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:364–378. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauml JM, Vinnakota R, Anna Park YH, et al. Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks Versus Weekly With Definitive Concurrent Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(5):490–7. 10.1093/jnci/djy133. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Picon H, Guddati AK. Mechanisms of resistance in head and neck cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(9):2742. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms