Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 13:13:710815.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.710815. eCollection 2022.

Dialectical Thinking: A Proposed Foundation for a Post-modern Psychology

Nikolay Veraksa  1 , Michael Basseches  2 , Angela Brandão  3
Affiliations
Review

Dialectical Thinking: A Proposed Foundation for a Post-modern Psychology

Nikolay Veraksa et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

For the authors, the way from a modern to a post-modern psychology requires dialectical thinking. Dialectical thinking recognizes the importance of contradiction, change, and synthesis; it also includes recognition of the value as well as limits of modern epistemological approaches. The article describes foundations for both ongoing efforts to understand and research the ontogeny of dialectical thinking and for appreciating the scope of dialectical thinking and its relevance for establishing a bridge from modern to post-modern psychology.

Keywords: dialectical thinking; limits of relativistic analyses; limits of universalistic-formal analyses; ontogeny; post-modern psychology; psychotherapy integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The structure of dialectical cycle D2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adorno T. W., Horkheimer M. (1979). Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: NLB.
    1. Allport G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    1. Andreev I. D. (1985). Dialectical Logic. Мoscow: Visshaya Shkola.
    1. Basseches M. (1978). Beyond closed-system problem-solving: A study of metasystematic aspects of mature thought. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
    1. Basseches M. (1980). Dialectical schemata: a framework for the empirical study of the development of dialectical thinking. Hum. Dev. 23, 400–421. doi: 10.1159/000272600 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources