Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;33(9):2083-2091.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15615. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

Defining electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate non-type 1 Brugada ECG variants from normal incomplete RBBB patterns in the young SCD-SOS cohort

Affiliations
Review

Defining electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate non-type 1 Brugada ECG variants from normal incomplete RBBB patterns in the young SCD-SOS cohort

Mafalda Carrington et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed the prevalence of non-type 1 Brugada pattern (T1BrP) in children and young adults from the Sudden Cardiac Death-Screening Of risk factorS cohort and the diagnostic yield of nonexpert manual and automatic algorithm electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements.

Methods: Cross-sectional study. We reviewed 14 662 ECGs and identified 2226 with a rSr'-pattern in V1-V2. Among these, 115 were classified by experts in hereditary arrhythmic-syndromes as having or not non-T1BrP, and were compared with measurements of 5 ECG-derived parameters based on a triangle formed by r' -wave (d(A), d(B), d(B)/h, β-angle) and ST-ascent, assessed both automatically and manually by nonexperts. We estimated intra- and interobserver concordance for each criterion, calculated diagnostic accuracy and defined the most appropriate cut-off values.

Results: A rSr'-pattern in V1-V2 was associated with higher PQ interval and QRS duration, male gender, and lower body mass index (BMI). The manual measurements of non-T1BrP criteria were moderately reproducible with high intraobserver and moderate interobserver concordance coefficients (ICC: 0.72-0.98, and 0.63-0.76). Criteria with higher discriminatory capacity were: distance d(B) (0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.80) and ST-ascent (0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92), which was superior to the 4 r'-wave criteria together (area under curve [AUC: 0.74]). We suggest new cut-offs with improved combination of sensitivity and specificity: d(B) ≥ 1.4 mm and ST-ascent ≥ 0.7 mm (sensitivity: 1%-82%; specificity: 71%-84%), that can be automatically measured to allow classification in four morphologies with increasing non-T1BrP probability.

Conclusion: rSr'-pattern in precordial leads V1-V2 is a frequent finding and the detection of non-T1BrP by using the aforementioned five measurements is reproducible and accurate. In this study, we describe new cut-off values that may help untrained clinicians to identify young individuals who may require further work-up for a potential Brugada Syndrome diagnosis.

Keywords: athlete's ECG; children and young adults; non-type 1 Brugada pattern; rSr′ pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brugada J, Campuzano O, Arbelo E, Sarquella-Brugada G, Brugada R. Present status of Brugada syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(9):1046-1059.
    1. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793-2867.
    1. Bayés De Luna A, Brugada J, Baranchuk A, et al. Current electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of Brugada pattern: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45(5):433-442.
    1. Serra G, Baranchuk A, Bayes-De-Luna A, et al. New electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from electrocardiogram of healthy athletes with r′-wave in leads V1/V2. Europace. 2014;16(11):1639-1645.
    1. Providência R, Silva J, Seca L, et al. Screening for warning signs of sudden cardiac death in the young: the SCD-SOS questionnaire. Rev Port Cardiol. 2010;29(7-8):1191-1205.

LinkOut - more resources