Defining electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate non-type 1 Brugada ECG variants from normal incomplete RBBB patterns in the young SCD-SOS cohort
- PMID: 35771489
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.15615
Defining electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate non-type 1 Brugada ECG variants from normal incomplete RBBB patterns in the young SCD-SOS cohort
Abstract
Introduction: We assessed the prevalence of non-type 1 Brugada pattern (T1BrP) in children and young adults from the Sudden Cardiac Death-Screening Of risk factorS cohort and the diagnostic yield of nonexpert manual and automatic algorithm electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements.
Methods: Cross-sectional study. We reviewed 14 662 ECGs and identified 2226 with a rSr'-pattern in V1-V2. Among these, 115 were classified by experts in hereditary arrhythmic-syndromes as having or not non-T1BrP, and were compared with measurements of 5 ECG-derived parameters based on a triangle formed by r' -wave (d(A), d(B), d(B)/h, β-angle) and ST-ascent, assessed both automatically and manually by nonexperts. We estimated intra- and interobserver concordance for each criterion, calculated diagnostic accuracy and defined the most appropriate cut-off values.
Results: A rSr'-pattern in V1-V2 was associated with higher PQ interval and QRS duration, male gender, and lower body mass index (BMI). The manual measurements of non-T1BrP criteria were moderately reproducible with high intraobserver and moderate interobserver concordance coefficients (ICC: 0.72-0.98, and 0.63-0.76). Criteria with higher discriminatory capacity were: distance d(B) (0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.80) and ST-ascent (0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92), which was superior to the 4 r'-wave criteria together (area under curve [AUC: 0.74]). We suggest new cut-offs with improved combination of sensitivity and specificity: d(B) ≥ 1.4 mm and ST-ascent ≥ 0.7 mm (sensitivity: 1%-82%; specificity: 71%-84%), that can be automatically measured to allow classification in four morphologies with increasing non-T1BrP probability.
Conclusion: rSr'-pattern in precordial leads V1-V2 is a frequent finding and the detection of non-T1BrP by using the aforementioned five measurements is reproducible and accurate. In this study, we describe new cut-off values that may help untrained clinicians to identify young individuals who may require further work-up for a potential Brugada Syndrome diagnosis.
Keywords: athlete's ECG; children and young adults; non-type 1 Brugada pattern; rSr′ pattern.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
The "rSr' ECG pattern" is not always a Brugada ECG pattern.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;33(9):2092-2093. doi: 10.1111/jce.15614. Epub 2022 Jul 16. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 35761753 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Criteria for evaluating rSr' patterns due to high precordial ECG lead placement accurately confirm absence of a Brugada ECG pattern.J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 6. J Electrocardiol. 2016. PMID: 26850497
-
New electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from electrocardiogram of healthy athletes with r'-wave in leads V1/V2.Europace. 2014 Nov;16(11):1639-45. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu025. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Europace. 2014. PMID: 24603955
-
[Doubts of the cardiologist regarding an electrocardiogram presenting QRS V1-V2 complexes with positive terminal wave and ST segment elevation. Consensus Conference promoted by the Italian Cardiology Society].G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2010 Nov;11(11 Suppl 2):3S-22S. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2010. PMID: 21361048 Italian.
-
Electrocardiographic variables associated with underlying Brugada syndrome or drug-induced Type 1 Brugada pattern in patients with slow/fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.J Arrhythm. 2022 May 6;38(4):633-641. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12729. eCollection 2022 Aug. J Arrhythm. 2022. PMID: 35936048 Free PMC article.
-
A Practical Approach to the Investigation of an rSr' Pattern in Leads V1-V2.Can J Cardiol. 2015 Dec;31(12):1493-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 18. Can J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26143139 Review.
Cited by
-
The diagnostic role of pharmacological provocation testing in cardiac electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC, the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), the Paediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4):euaf067. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf067. Europace. 2025. PMID: 40165484 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Brugada J, Campuzano O, Arbelo E, Sarquella-Brugada G, Brugada R. Present status of Brugada syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(9):1046-1059.
-
- Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793-2867.
-
- Bayés De Luna A, Brugada J, Baranchuk A, et al. Current electrocardiographic criteria for diagnosis of Brugada pattern: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45(5):433-442.
-
- Serra G, Baranchuk A, Bayes-De-Luna A, et al. New electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from electrocardiogram of healthy athletes with r′-wave in leads V1/V2. Europace. 2014;16(11):1639-1645.
-
- Providência R, Silva J, Seca L, et al. Screening for warning signs of sudden cardiac death in the young: the SCD-SOS questionnaire. Rev Port Cardiol. 2010;29(7-8):1191-1205.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous