Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0269234.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269234. eCollection 2022.

Interferon gamma release assays for diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interferon gamma release assays for diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chunnian Ren et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Although the Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) is often used to identify latent tuberculosis, it also plays a crucial role in diagnosing active extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Some studies have assessed the use of IGRA as a biomarker for osteoarticular tuberculosis (OATB), which is elevated following TB infection. Still, conclusive results about its effectiveness have not been reported.

Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochran databases. We obtained literature related to the diagnosis of OATB by IGRA, and the retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to June 2021. The bivariate random effect model was used to summarize the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of other indicators in diagnosing OATB by IGRA, and the forest plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for testing.

Results: We included seven studies involving 643 subjects in diagnosing OATB by IGRA. The comprehensive sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66-0.87), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87.

Conclusion: In blood samples, the diagnostic accuracy of IGRAS is poor in patients with suspected OAT. We conclude that IGRA may not be appropriate for patients with OATB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the study selection process.
The flowchart shows the procedure used to select the articles for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Risk of bias assessment of the included studies.
According to the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2), the summary of the methodological quality of studies.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of interferon-γ release assay in the diagnosis of OATB: A study forest plot.
Filled squares represent sensitivity/specificity estimates from studies done using. interferon-γ release assay. See references 24 to 30 for details. Thresholds for the interpretation of I2 are as follows: 0% to 40%: might not be essential; 30% to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Summarize the receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and summarize the performance of interferon-gamma release assay in the diagnosis of OATB.
Each study is represented by an open circle whose size is proportional to the inverse standard error of sensitivity and specificity. The filled square represents the summary estimate of the test accuracy, with the surrounding dashed zone outline denoting the 95% confidence region around this estimate.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Deeks’ funnel plots for publication bias.
Deeks funnel plot assessment test evaluates the potential publication bias for interferon-gamma release assays on OATB. The plot shows the symmetric distribution of the log of diagnostic odds ratios against the inverse root of effective sample sizes (ESS), indicating the absence of any publication bias.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tang Y, Yin L, Tang S, Zhang H, Lan J. Application of molecular, microbiological, and immunological tests for the diagnosis of bone and joint tuberculosis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018. Feb;32(2):e22260. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22260 Epub 2017 May 22. ; PMCID: PMC6816924. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du F, Xie L, Zhang Y, Gao F, Zhang H, Chen W, et al.. Prospective Comparison of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB Assays for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2018. Apr 12;8(1):5882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24285-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Misra SP, Misra V, Dwivedi M, Gupta SC. Colonic tuberculosis: clinical features, endoscopic appearance and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999. Jul;14(7):723–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.1999.01940.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kulchavenya E. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: are statistical reports accurate? Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2014. Apr;2(2):61–70. doi: 10.1177/2049936114528173 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lesić A, Bumbasirević M, Savić B, Cobeljić G, Pesut D. Savremena dijagnostika i lecenje kostnosglobne tuberkuloze [Current diagnosis and treatment of the osteoarticular tuberculosis]. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2004. Sep-Oct;132(9–10):345–51. Serbian. doi: 10.2298/sarh0410345l - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms