Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov;208(5):1018-1027.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Prostate Specific Antigen and Biopsy Contamination in the Göteborg-1 Randomized, Population-Based, Prostate Cancer Screening Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prostate Specific Antigen and Biopsy Contamination in the Göteborg-1 Randomized, Population-Based, Prostate Cancer Screening Trial

K Stinesen Kollberg et al. J Urol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Even when a screening study has demonstrated a mortality reduction, the degree of pre-testing and contamination is of importance as it can dilute the "true" effect of screening. Our object was to describe the level of pre-testing and contamination in the Göteborg-1 prostate cancer screening trial.

Materials and methods: A total of 20,000 men, 50-64 years old, were invited in 1994 and randomized to either a screening group (offered prostate specific antigen testing every 2 years) or to a control group. Follow-up was through December 31, 2014. Outcome measurement was overall testing in the screening group and control group. A positive prostate specific antigen test was defined as a prostate specific antigen ≥3 ng/ml.

Results: In the study, 4.2% in the screening group and 4.6% men in the control group were tested before study start. During follow-up, 72% in the control group took at least 1 prostate specific antigen test (contamination) compared to 87% of men in the screening group. Of all prostate specific antigens, 24% in the screening group and 39% in the control group were above threshold. In total, 66% of the men underwent prostate biopsy within 12 months from a raised prostate specific antigen in the screening group and 28% in the control group.

Conclusions: Similar proportions of men were prostate specific antigen-tested in both the screening group and control group, yet only a minority of contamination prostate specific antigens led to biopsy. Also, men in the screening group started screening at a younger age. These could both be explanations for our result that organized screening is more effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality than non-organized testing. When carried out properly and compared to an unscreened population, the effects of organized screening are likely even greater than previously shown in the Göteborg screening trial.

Keywords: prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Gulati R, Nyame YA. Gulati R, et al. J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1027. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.04. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065679 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Shoag JE. Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, et al. J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1026-1027. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.03. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065680 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Dahm P. Dahm P. J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1025-1026. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.02. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065681 No abstract available.
  • Editorial Comment.
    Wallis CJD, Klaassen Z. Wallis CJD, et al. J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1025. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.01. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065682 No abstract available.

Publication types

Substances