Prostate Specific Antigen and Biopsy Contamination in the Göteborg-1 Randomized, Population-Based, Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
- PMID: 35771961
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835
Prostate Specific Antigen and Biopsy Contamination in the Göteborg-1 Randomized, Population-Based, Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
Abstract
Purpose: Even when a screening study has demonstrated a mortality reduction, the degree of pre-testing and contamination is of importance as it can dilute the "true" effect of screening. Our object was to describe the level of pre-testing and contamination in the Göteborg-1 prostate cancer screening trial.
Materials and methods: A total of 20,000 men, 50-64 years old, were invited in 1994 and randomized to either a screening group (offered prostate specific antigen testing every 2 years) or to a control group. Follow-up was through December 31, 2014. Outcome measurement was overall testing in the screening group and control group. A positive prostate specific antigen test was defined as a prostate specific antigen ≥3 ng/ml.
Results: In the study, 4.2% in the screening group and 4.6% men in the control group were tested before study start. During follow-up, 72% in the control group took at least 1 prostate specific antigen test (contamination) compared to 87% of men in the screening group. Of all prostate specific antigens, 24% in the screening group and 39% in the control group were above threshold. In total, 66% of the men underwent prostate biopsy within 12 months from a raised prostate specific antigen in the screening group and 28% in the control group.
Conclusions: Similar proportions of men were prostate specific antigen-tested in both the screening group and control group, yet only a minority of contamination prostate specific antigens led to biopsy. Also, men in the screening group started screening at a younger age. These could both be explanations for our result that organized screening is more effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality than non-organized testing. When carried out properly and compared to an unscreened population, the effects of organized screening are likely even greater than previously shown in the Göteborg screening trial.
Keywords: prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1027. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.04. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065679 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1026-1027. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.03. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065680 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1025-1026. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.02. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065681 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1025. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002835.01. Epub 2022 Sep 6. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36065682 No abstract available.