Silk Vista Baby flow diverter stent for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective observational study
- PMID: 35773522
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03003-x
Silk Vista Baby flow diverter stent for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective observational study
Abstract
Purpose: Flow diversion changed the approach to complex intracranial aneurysms, leading to a widespread use and a rapid technological evolution. Indeed, indications continued to expand, including ruptured intracranial aneurysms in selected cases. Recently, new devices have been designed specifically to target smaller vessels. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate clinical outcome, complications, and occlusion rate of patients with ruptured aneurysms treated with new generation low profile Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter stent (FD).
Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study on consecutive patients who underwent treatment with SVB for ruptured aneurysms at 12 Italian centers. Primary end point was favorable clinical outcome rate, defined as modified ranking score (mRS) of 0-2 at the 3 months. Secondary outcomes were complication rate, aneurysm re-rupture, and complete aneurysm occlusion at last radiological follow-up.
Results: Twenty-five patients were included; at 3 months' follow-up, 19 patients (79.1%) had favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2). Three patients (12.5%) died during follow-up. In-stent thrombosis occurred in two cases (8.3%), managed with glycoprotein IIb/IIIA and intra-stent angioplasty, without clinical consequences. In 18 (85.7%) patients, complete occlusion at 3 months was demonstrated. No rebleeding occurred during follow-up. Presentation with unfavorable World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading system (WFNS) and posterior circulation location were both significantly correlated with unfavorable clinical outcome (p = 0.005 and p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Our data suggests that low profile FD treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms located distally of the circle of Willis is feasible. New generation low profile FD may represent an alternative option in carefully selected cases.
Keywords: Endovascular treatment; Flow diverter stent; Ruptured aneurysms.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM et al (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817 - DOI
-
- Li H, Pan R, Wang H, Rong X et al (2013) Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44:29–37 - DOI
-
- Andaluz N, Zuccarello M (2011) Treatment strategies for complex intracranial aneurysms: review of a 12-year experience at the University of Cincinnati. Skull Base 21:233–242 - DOI
-
- Bodily KD, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G et al (2011) Stent-assisted coiling in acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1232–1236 - DOI
-
- Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2015) Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2331–2339 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials