Occurrence of complications in patients restored with implants
- PMID: 35774013
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13970
Occurrence of complications in patients restored with implants
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the occurrence and clustering of complications in subjects restored with fixed implant-supported prostheses.
Methods: In the present retrospective case series, 241 subjects treated at one clinical centre and provided with 729 implants were included. A clinical and radiographic examination was performed after a mean follow-up period of 4.8 ± 2.0 years. Additional information on occurrence of technical (chipping, loss of retention, fracture of components) and biological complications (marginal bone loss, implant loss) during follow-up was extracted from patient records. For each type of complication and complications overall, regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate time to event for implant loss and technical complications.
Results: In all, 30% of the 241 patients presented with at least one complication of technical and/or biological character during the follow-up period. Technical complications affected 19.5% of subjects, while 14.1% presented with marginal bone loss >2 mm. Implant loss occurred in 4.6% of subjects. While technical complications were noted already early during the maintenance period (<1200 days), implant loss typically occurred during a later phase. A small subgroup of subjects (7.9%) experienced more than one type of complication.
Conclusions: Complications occurred frequently and the most common type of complication was of technical character. Technical and biological complications occurred independently of each other.
Keywords: biomechanics; clinical assessment; diagnosis; finite elemente analysis; patient centered outcomes.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Technical Complications and Prosthesis Survival Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 12-Year Follow-Up.J Prosthodont. 2020 Jan;29(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13119. Epub 2019 Nov 21. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 31650669
-
Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01530-2. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 33794841 Free PMC article.
-
A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4794. Int J Prosthodont. 2016. PMID: 27611744
-
Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.022. Epub 2020 Jan 22. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. PMID: 31982146 Review.
-
Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:135-153. doi: 10.1111/clr.13352. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30328200
Cited by
-
Preclinical Performance of a Novel Dental Implant Design Reducing Mechanical Stress in Cortical Bone.J Funct Biomater. 2025 Mar 14;16(3):102. doi: 10.3390/jfb16030102. J Funct Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40137381 Free PMC article.
-
Is root canal treatment and an indirect coronal restoration of a mandibular first molar cost-effective compared to extraction and an implant-supported crown? A decision analytic approach.Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Feb 27;84:95-103. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.42894. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40014382 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative outcomes of endodontically treated teeth versus dental implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review.Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Jun 24;84:386-396. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43871. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40552466 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila-Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. A., Huynh-Ba, G., Iacono, V., Koo, K. T., Lambert, F., McCauley, L., Quirynen, M., Renvert, S., . . . Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(Suppl 20), S286-S291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12957
-
- Brägger, U., Karoussis, I., Persson, G. R., Pjetursson, B. E., Salvi, G. E., & Lang, N. P. (2005). Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16(3), 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x
-
- Cecchinato, D., Parpaiola, A., & Lindhe, J. (2013). A cross-sectional study on the prevalence of marginal bone loss among implant patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02457.x
-
- Cecchinato, D., Parpaiola, A., & Lindhe, J. (2014). Mucosal inflammation and incidence of crestal bone loss among implant patients: A 10-year study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(7), 791-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12209
-
- Derks, J., Schaller, D., Hakansson, J., Wennström, J. L., Tomasi, C., & Berglundh, T. (2016). Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: Prevalence of peri-implantitis. Journal of Dental Research, 95(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515608832
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources