Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1986;108(24):1473-81.

[Indications for tocolysis. A prospective study]

[Article in German]
  • PMID: 3577451
Clinical Trial

[Indications for tocolysis. A prospective study]

[Article in German]
G Zeller et al. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986.

Abstract

In a prospectively randomised group of pregnant patients showing signs of prematurity, who had undergone long-term tocolysis between the 28th and 38th week of gestation--mainly with Fenoterol--the interval between the end of the tocolytic therapy and the delivery is noted. According to the duration of the end of tocolysis to delivery interval (TEDI) the indication for tocolysis can be retrospectively investigated. In patients where the TEDI was 72 hours or less, tocolysis is regarded as being necessary, and in patients with TEDI of longer than 72 hours, tocolysis is regarded as questionable or unnecessary. In this study in 49% of the cases tocolysis was necessary, whereby the primapara had a shorter TEDI on the average than the multipara. Both groups with short and long TEDI are compared with reference to obstetrical parameters, whereby virtually only the greater anamnestic strain of the patients with short TEDI emerged. There is not easily recognizable uniform criterion which can identify prospectively those patients whose baby is born within 72 hours after the tocolytic therapy has been discontinued. The results are discussed under the aspect of unsolved problems in the indication for tocolytic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms