Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;40(2):225-234.
doi: 10.1177/10499091221104732. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Care Disruptions and End-Of-Life Care Experiences Among Home-Based Primary Care Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City: A Retrospective Chart Review

Affiliations

Care Disruptions and End-Of-Life Care Experiences Among Home-Based Primary Care Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City: A Retrospective Chart Review

Emily Franzosa et al. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Research on deaths during COVID-19 has largely focused on hospitals and nursing homes. Less is known about medically complex patients receiving care in the community. We examined care disruptions and end-of-life experiences of homebound patients receiving home-based primary care (HBPC) in New York City during the initial 2020 COVID-19 surge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients enrolled in Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors who died between March 1-June 30, 2020. We collected patient sociodemographic and clinical data and analyzed care disruptions and end-of-life experiences using clinical notes, informed by thematic and narrative analysis. Results: Among 1300 homebound patients, 112 (9%) died during the study period. Patients who died were more likely to be older, non-Hispanic white, and have dementia than those who survived. Thirty percent of decedents had confirmed or probable COVID-19. Fifty-eight (52%) were referred to hospice and 50 enrolled. Seventy-three percent died at home. We identified multiple intersecting disruptions in family caregiving, paid caregiving, medical supplies and services, and hospice care, as well as hospital avoidance, complicating EOL experiences. The HBPC team responded by providing clinical, logistical and emotional support to patients and families. Conclusion: Despite substantial care disruptions, the majority of patients in our study died at home with support from their HBPC team as the practice worked to manage care disruptions. Our findings suggest HBPC's multi-disciplinary, team-based model may be uniquely suited to meet the needs of the most medically and socially vulnerable older adults at end of life during public health emergencies.

Keywords: COVID-19; community-based care; end-of-life; home-based medical care; home-based primary care; homebound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This article does not reflect the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Key policy, Mount Sinai and MSVD events during the spring 2020 New York City COVID-19 surge. Legend: From the identification of the first NYC COVID-19 case on March 1, 2020, the disease spread rapidly as state and local leaders implemented emergency policy measures to slow transmission and increase health system capacity (events noted in black). These policies and the volume of COVID-19 cases had a cascading effect on the health system, which opened a field hospital and a Palliative Care at Home service, and MSVD, which stopped enrolling new patients and transitioned to largely virtual care (events noted in blue). Up to 60% of MSVD clinical staff was redeployed throughout the health system each week, requiring the team to work closely together to maintain continuous patient care. MSVD deaths peaked throughout April.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Analytic Approach.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
MSVD Monthly Mortality Rate from 12/2019-12/2020. Legend: At the height of the initial pandemic surge in April 2020, the practice mortality rate increased fourfold over a typical month. The rising mortality rate at the end of the year reflects the second pandemic surge in winter 2020.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Levels of COVID-19 related disruptions and impact on MSVD practice and patients. Legend: National, state, and city policies to curb COVID-19 transmission alongside community spread of the virus interacted to create new pressures for the health system, the MSVD practice, and patients and caregivers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ornstein KA, Leff B, Covinsky KE, et al.Epidemiology of the homebound population in the United States. JAMA internal medicine 2015;175(7):1180-1186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soones T, Federman A, Leff B, Siu AL, Ornstein K. Two‐year mortality in homebound older adults: An analysis of the national health and aging trends study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(1):123-129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reckrey JM, Yang M, Kinosian B, Bollens-Lund E, Leff B, Ritchie C, et al.Receipt of home-based medical care among older beneficiaries enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare: Study examines receipt of home-based medical care among community-dwelling, fee-for-service medicare beneficiaries age sixty-five or older. Health Aff. 2020;39(8):1289-1296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dang S, Penney LS, Trivedi R, et al.Caring for caregivers during COVID‐19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abrashkin KA, Zhang J, Poku A. Acute, post-acute, and primary care utilization in a home-based primary care program during COVID-19. Gerontol. 2021;61(1):78-85. - PMC - PubMed