Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0270711.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270711. eCollection 2022.

Sepsis assessment and management in critically Ill adults: A systematic review

Mohammad Rababa  1 , Dania Bani Hamad  1 , Audai A Hayajneh  1
Affiliations

Sepsis assessment and management in critically Ill adults: A systematic review

Mohammad Rababa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Early assessment and management of patients with sepsis can significantly reduce its high mortality rates and improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Objectives: The purposes of this review are to: (1) explore nurses' knowledge, attitude, practice, and perceived barriers and facilitators related to early recognition and management of sepsis, (2) explore different interventions directed at nurses to improve sepsis management.

Methods: A systematic review method according to the PRISMA guidelines was used. An electronic search was conducted in March 2021 on several databases using combinations of keywords. Two researchers independently selected and screened the articles according to the eligibility criteria.

Results: Nurses reported an adequate of knowledge in certain areas of sepsis assessment and management in critically ill adult patients. Also, nurses' attitudes toward sepsis assessment and management were positive in general, but they reported some misconceptions regarding antibiotic use for patients with sepsis, and that sepsis was inevitable for critically ill adult patients. Furthermore, nurses reported they either were not well-prepared or confident enough to effectively recognize and promptly manage sepsis. Also, there are different kinds of nurses' perceived barriers and facilitators related to sepsis assessment and management: nurse, patient, physician, and system-related. There are different interventions directed at nurses to help in improving nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice of sepsis assessment and management. These interventions include education sessions, simulation, decision support or screening tools for sepsis, and evidence-based treatment protocols/guidelines.

Discussion: Our findings could help hospital managers in developing continuous education and staff development training programs on assessing and managing sepsis in critical care patients.

Conclusion: Nurses have poor to good knowledge, practices, and attitudes toward sepsis as well as report many barriers related to sepsis management in adult critically ill patients. Despite all education interventions, no study has collectively targeted critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practice of sepsis management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rahman NI, Chan CM, Zakaria MI, Jaafar MJ. Knowledge and attitude towards identification of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis among emergency personnel in tertiary teaching hospital. Australasian emergency care. 2019. Mar 1;22(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.11.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, et al.. Incidence and mortality of hospital-and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive care medicine. 2020. Aug;46(8):1552–62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). Jama. 2016. Feb 23;315(8):801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skube SJ, Katz SA, Chipman JG, Tignanelli CJ. Acute kidney injury and sepsis. Surgical infections. 2018;19(2):216–24. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.261 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guillen-Guio B, Lorenzo-Salazar JM, Ma SF, Hou PC, Hernandez-Beeftink T, Corrales A, et al.. Sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome in individuals of European ancestry: a genome-wide association study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020. Mar 1;8(3):258–66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30368-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types