Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;56(4):1197-1204.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.28321. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Parameters Affecting Worst-Case Gradient-Field Heating of Passive Conductive Implants

Howard Bassen  1 , Tayeb Zaidi  1
Affiliations

Parameters Affecting Worst-Case Gradient-Field Heating of Passive Conductive Implants

Howard Bassen et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Testing MRI gradient-induced heating of implanted medical devices is required by regulatory organizations and others. A gradient heating test of the ISO 10974 Technical Specification (TS) for active implants was adopted for this study of passive hip implants. All but one previous study of hip implants used nonuniform gradient exposure fields in clinical scanners and reported heating of less than 5 °C. This present study adapted methods of the TS, addressing the unmet need for identifying worst-case heating via exposures to uniform gradient fields.

Purpose: To identify gradient-field parameters affecting maximum heating in vitro for a hip implant and a cylindrical titanium disk.

Study type: Computational simulations and experimental validation of induced heating.

Phantom: Tissue-simulating gel.

Field strength: 42 T/s RMS, sinusoidal, continuous B fields with high spatial uniformity ASSESSMENT: Hip implant heating at 1-10 kHz, via computational modeling, validated by limited point measurements. Experimental measurements of exposures of an implant at 42 T/s for 4, 6, and 9 kHz, analyzed at 50, 100, and 150 seconds.

Statistical tests: One sample student's t-test to assess difference between computational and experimental results. Experimental vs. computational results were not significantly different (p < 0.05).

Results: Maximum simulated temperature rise (10-minute exposure) was 10 °C at 1 kHz and 0.66 °C at 10 kHz. The ratio of the rise for 21 T/s vs. 42 T/s RMS was 4, after stabilizing at 50 seconds (dB/dt ratio squared).

Data conclusions: Heating of an implant is proportional to the frequency of the B field and the implant's cross-sectional area and is greater for a thickness on the order of its skin depth. Testing with lower values of dB/dt RMS with lower cost amplifiers enables prediction of heating at higher values for dB/dt squared (per ISO TS) with identical frequency components and waveforms, once thermal equilibrium occurs.

Evidence level: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Keywords: MRI safety; computational modeling; gradient field; heating; hip implant; temperature measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Graf H, Steidle G, Schick F. Heating of metallic implants and instruments induced by gradient switching in a 1.5-Tesla whole-body unit. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1328-1333.
    1. Winter L, Seifert F, Zilberti L, Murbach M, Ittermann B. MRI-related heating of implants and devices: A review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021;53:1646-1665.
    1. Zilberti L, Arduino A, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M. The underestimated role of gradient coils in MRI safety. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:13-15.
    1. Stroud J, Stupic K, Walsh T, Celinski Z, Hankiewicz JH. Local heating of metallic objects from switching magnetic gradients in MRI. Proc. SPIE 10954, Medical Imaging 2019: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications, Vol 10954: San Diego CA, U.S.A.: SPIE; 2019. p 150-161.
    1. El Bannan K, Handler W, Chronik B, Salisbury SP. Heating of metallic rods induced by time-varying gradient fields in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:411-416.

LinkOut - more resources