Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11151.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15243-1.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled breath from non-hospitalized COVID-19-infected individuals

Affiliations

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled breath from non-hospitalized COVID-19-infected individuals

Cæcilie Leding et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on detection of SARS-CoV-2 in oro-/nasopharyngel swabs, but due to discomfort and minor risk during the swab procedure, detection of SARS-CoV-2 has been investigated in other biological matrixes. In this proof-of-concept study, individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection performed a daily air sample for five days. Air samples were obtained through a non-invasive electrostatic air sampler. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was determined with qRT-PCR. The association of positive samples with different exposures was evaluated through mixed-effect models. We obtained 665 air samples from 111 included participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, 52 individuals (46.8%) had at least one positive air sample, and 129 (19.4%) air samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Participants with symptoms or a symptom duration ≤ four days had significantly higher odds of having a positive air sample. Cycle threshold values were significantly lower in samples obtained ≤ 4 days from symptom onset. Neither variant of SARS-CoV-2 nor method of air sampling were associated with a positive air sample. We demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 is detectable in human breath by electrostatic air sampling with the highest detection rate closest to symptom onset. We suggest further evaluation of the air sampling technique to increase sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.S. reports employment of AeroCollect A/S, Brøndby, Denmark. K.U. and L.K.D. report employment of FORCE Technology, Brøndby, Denmark. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of enrollment of participants. OP oropharyngeal, RT-PCR reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Total number and number of positive air samples per day from symptom onset, and (b) percent positive air samples per day from symptom onset obtained through singing/loud talking from confirmed COVID-19 patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Generalized linear mixed model analyses of having a positive air sample stratified by exposures presented as OR. CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, ref reference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koskinen, A. et al. Complications of COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal Swab Test. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.147, 672–674 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Föh B, et al. Complications of nasal and pharyngeal swabs: a relevant challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur. Respir. J. 2021;57:2004004. doi: 10.1183/13993003.04004-2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shenoy S. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), viral load and clinical outcomes; lessons learned one year into the pandemic: A systematic review. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2021;10:132–150. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i4.132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tang S, et al. Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, prevention and control. Environ. Int. 2020;144:106039. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morawska L, Cao J. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environ. Int. 2020;139:105730. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types