Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;12(1):11146.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15169-8.

Postoperative recovery patterns following discectomy surgery in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

Affiliations

Postoperative recovery patterns following discectomy surgery in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

Shuaijin Wang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data aimed to identify unique pain and disability trajectories in patients following lumbar discectomy surgery. Patients of this study population presented chiefly with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent discectomy surgery from thirteen sites enrolled in the CSORN registry. Outcome variables of interest included numeric rating scales for leg/back pain and modified Oswestry disability index scores at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify distinct courses in each outcome. Data from 524 patients revealed three unique trajectories for leg pain (excellent = 18.4%, good = 55.4%, poor = 26.3%), disability (excellent = 59.7%, fair = 35.6%, poor = 4.7%) and back pain (excellent = 13.0%, good = 56.4%, poor = 30.6%). Construct validity was supported by statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients attaining the criteria for minimal important change (MIC; 30%) or clinical success in disability (50% or Oswestry score ≤ 22) (p < 0.001). The variable proportions of patients belonging to poor outcome trajectories shows a disconnect between improved disability and persistence of pain. It will be beneficial to incorporate this information into the realm of patient expectation setting in concert with future findings of potential factors predictive of subgroup membership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study was partially supported by a CA$5,000 scholarship provided by the Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick Research in Medicine Summer Studentship to S.W. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
3-Class clinical outcome trajectory groups. (a) Leg pain trajectories (N = 517); (b) back pain trajectories (N = 469); (c) disability trajectories (N = 502). Point estimates represent the mean score at each time point (0–10 numeric pain rating scale or 0–100 modified Oswestry disability index). Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol. Clin. 2007;25(2):387–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Konstantinou K, Dunn KM. Sciatica: Review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine. 2008;33(22):2464–2472. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318183a4a2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barry JA, Elia C, Saini HS, Miulli DE. A review of lumbar radiculopathy, diagnosis, and treatment. Cureus. 2019;11(10):e5934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5934. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gugliotta M, da Costa BR, Dabis E, Theiler R, Jüni P, Reichenbach S, et al. Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e012938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012938. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JAH, Tans JTJ, et al. Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356(22):2245–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types