A population-based validation study of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma
- PMID: 35778691
- PMCID: PMC9248086
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09781-0
A population-based validation study of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma
Abstract
Background: The 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM8 (Tumour, Nodes, Metastasis) melanoma staging system introduced several modifications from the 7th edition (TNM7), resulting in changes in survival and subgroup composition. We set out to address the limited validation of TNM8 (stages I-IV) in large population-based datasets.
Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 6,414 patients from the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated the melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for MSS and OS across stage groups. The Schemper-Henderson measure was used to assess the variance explained in the Cox regression.
Results: In our sample, 21.3% of patients were reclassified with TNM8 from TNM7; reclassifications in stage II were uncommon, and 44.1% of patients in stage III were reclassified to a higher subgroup. Minimal changes in MSS curves were observed between editions, but the stage IIB curve decreased and the stage IIIC curve increased. For TNM8, Stage I (n = 4,556), II (n = 1,206), III (n = 598), and IV (n = 54) had an estimated 5-year MSS of 98.4%, 82.5%, 66.4%, and 14.4%, respectively. Within stage III, IIIA 5-year MSS was 91.7% while stage IIID was 23.5%. HRs indicated that TNM8 more evenly separates subgroups once adjusted for patient- and disease-characteristics. The variance in MSS explained by TNM7 and TNM8 is 18.9% and 19.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: TNM8 performed well in our sample, with more even separation of stage subgroups and a modest improvement in predictive ability compared to TNM7.
Keywords: Cohort studies; Melanoma; Neoplasm staging; Ontario; Prognosis; Skin neoplasms; Survival analysis.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
TDB reports unrelated advisory board/honorarium for Astra Zeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, Roche, Novartis, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb. YA reports unrelated research grants from the Canadian Dermatology Foundation, Sanofi, Pfizer, Leo Pharma, and Novartis and honoraria from the Canadian Society for Allergy and Immunology, Medexus, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, L’Oreal, Aralez, Bausch and Novartis. The remaining authors have no declarations of competing interest.
Figures
References
-
- Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2019. (cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2019-EN (accessed 7 June 2021)).
-
- Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, Lazar AJ, Faries MB, Kirkwood JM, McArthur GA, Haydu LE, Eggermont AMM, et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual: Melanoma Staging: AJCC 8th Edition. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:472–92. doi: 10.3322/caac.21409. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brierley JD. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2017.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
