Cesarean Scar Pregnancies Treated by Uterine Artery Chemotherapy Embolization Combined With Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage: A Retrospective Study
- PMID: 35778904
- DOI: 10.1002/jum.16050
Cesarean Scar Pregnancies Treated by Uterine Artery Chemotherapy Embolization Combined With Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the effect of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment by comparing uterine artery chemotherapy embolization (UACE) combined with dilation and curettage (D&C) with or without ultrasound guidance.
Methods: CSP patients treated with UACE combined with D&C from January 2013 to December 2020 at Shuguang Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into groups A and B according to whether D&C was guided by ultrasound.
Results: Forty-eight patients with CSP diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound were included in this study, whose gestational age was <8 weeks. There were no significant differences in the basic clinical characteristics of the two groups. The success rates of the 2 groups were no significant difference, 100% (27/27) in group A and 85.7% (18/21) in group B. The maximal intraoperative blood loss of group A was 100 mL and that of group B was 150 mL. There was no uterine perforation during the operation. Ultrasound guidance can shorten the D&C operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding during D&C, and decrease the residual rate of trophoblastic tissue after D&C.
Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance can improve the safety and efficiency of UACE combined with D&C in the treatment of CSP and reduce its complications. We believe it is an optimal treatment for CSP patients who do not plan to have children in the future.
Keywords: cesarean scar pregnancy; dilation and curettage; retrospective study; ultrasound- guided; uterine artery chemotherapy embolization.
© 2022 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Uterine artery embolization plus ultrasound guided curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy: Five-year experience at a single tertiary hospital.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;64(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2024.09.021. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 39794058
-
Comparison of efficacies between ultrasound-guided curettage combined with hysteroscopic electro-resection after injection of pituitrin and hysteroscopic electro-resection after methotrexate chemotherapy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3041-3047. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2081793. Epub 2022 Jun 7. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 35672873
-
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26803916
-
Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: 11-year experience at a medical center.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2162818. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2162818. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023. PMID: 36597830 Review.
-
Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: results of a case series and review of the literature.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.08.013. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012. PMID: 23177105 Review.
Cited by
-
Hysteroscopy improves surgical outcomes of hydatidiform moles while reducing postoperative residuals.Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):6718-6726. doi: 10.62347/JPHM2503. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 39678565 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation.Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 3;30:e943550. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943550. Med Sci Monit. 2024. PMID: 38566372 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of multimodal vaginal ultrasound in the detection and assessment of scar healing after caesarean section: a correlational meta-analysis.Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2523558. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2523558. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Ann Med. 2025. PMID: 40587769 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- O'Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013; 120:671-680.
-
- Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Svarre NH. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril 2016; 105:958-967.
-
- Ngu SF, Cheung VY. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115:295-297.
-
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Miller R, Timor IE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) consult series #49: cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:B2-B14.
-
- Yang XY, Li KM, Chu YX, Zheng A. Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 117:990-996.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical