Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jul:135:102230.
doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102230. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

Cerebrospinal fluid AFB smear in adults with tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cerebrospinal fluid AFB smear in adults with tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

Anna M Stadelman et al. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Ziehl-Neelsen acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear is a rapid, cheap, widely available test for tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Yet, reported test sensitivity is highly variable. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for CSF AFB smear vs. other mycobacterial tests to diagnose TBM.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of AFB smear against mycobacterial tests (reference standard) in adults (≥15 years) with suspected TBM. We used the QUADAS-2 tool to assess risk of bias. We estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity of AFB smear versus the reference standard using random-effects bivariate modeling. We used the I2 statistic to assess heterogeneity between studies.

Results: Of 981 articles identified, 11 were eligible for inclusion with a total of 1713 participants. Seven studies were from high-TB burden settings and 4 from low-TB burden settings. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CSF AFB smear were 8% (95%CI 3-21) and 100% (95%CI 90-100), with substantial heterogeneity in diagnostic performance (I2 >95% for both) and reference standards.

Conclusion: CSF AFB smear has poor sensitivity in most settings. If other more sensitive tests are available, those should be used preferentially rather than CSF AFB smear.

Keywords: Acid-fast bacilli; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Tuberculous meningitis; Ziehl-neelsen stain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
PRISMA Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of AFB Smear versus reference standard TP=true positive, FN=false negative, FP=false positive, TN=true negative Meta-analysis of the diagnosis of tuberculous mdeningitis in the 11 studies included. Reference standards for each of the studies included some combination of AFB smear, CSF profile, M. tuberculosis culture, NAAT, B symptom evaluation, and/or the Uniform Tuberculous Meningitis Case Definition (Marais criteria). Dashed vertical lines show the pooled estimates. I2 shows inter-study heterogeneity.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of AFB smear versus reference standard HSROC=hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve Area under the hierarchical summary ROC curve C-statistic is 0·74 (95% CI 0·70–0·77). The confidence region shows the range that is likely to contain the population summary operating point and the prediction region is the range that is likely to contain where study data that are not yet observed would fall. Circle size corresponds to sample size in the included studies, where larger circles indicate larger sample sizes relative to other included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seddon JA, Thwaites GE, Tuberculous Meningitis International Research C. 2019. Tuberculous meningitis: new tools and new approaches required. Wellcome Open Res 4:181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stadelman AM, Ellis J, Samuels THA, Mutengesa E, Dobbin J, Ssebambulidde K, Rutakingirwa MK, Tugume L, Boulware DR, Grint D, Cresswell FV. 2020. Treatment Outcomes in Adult Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 7:ofaa257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seddon JA, Wilkinson R, van Crevel R, Figaji A, Thwaites GE, Tuberculous Meningitis International Research C. 2019. Knowledge gaps and research priorities in tuberculous meningitis. Wellcome Open Res 4:188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, van Crevel R, Mai NTH, Dooley KE, Caws M, Figaji A, Savic R, Solomons R, Thwaites GE, Tuberculous Meningitis International Research C. 2017. Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol 13:581–598. - PubMed
    1. Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, Torok ME, Misra UK, Prasad K, Donald PR, Wilkinson RJ, Marais BJ. 2010. Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis 10:803–12. - PubMed

Publication types