Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;19(2):224-235.
doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00499-w. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science

Affiliations

Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science

Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva et al. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Dental age estimation (DAE) is one of the most reliable and useful scientific methods employed by forensic odontology (FO) for human identification. In 2009, the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report highlighted the need to deepen research in many disciplines, among which FO received strong criticism for specific expertise. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview in order to systematically map the latest original research done in FO, as well as identify DAE within this field. A systematic search was performed from 2014 to 2019. In total, 644 studies were identified for qualitative analysis: DAE was the most studied topic (41.30%). Asia was the most productive continent with 58.27% of the global production on DAE; India was the most productive Asian country, with 32.33% and 55.48% of global and Asian production, respectively. The University of Macerata (Italy), KU Leuven (Belgium), University of Split (Croatia), and University of São Paulo (Brazil) led DAE research. Authors from leading countries on DAE research demonstrated great individual productivity, which is evidence of their scientific efforts, but also possible risks if the continuity of this line of research depends on them. Although FO has significantly focused its research on DAE, the absence of publications on controversial topics but necessary for research according to the NAS report shows the possible lack of interest of authors or journals to address them.

Keywords: Bite mark evidence; Dental age estimation; Forensic odontology; NAS report; Publications; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2009.
    1. Shah P, Velani PR, Lakade L, Dukle S. Teeth in forensics: a review. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(2):291–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_9_17 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification guide. 2018. https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/621/file/FS-02_2018-03_EN_D... . Accessed 13 April 2022.
    1. Adserias-Garriga J. Evolution of methods and state-of-the-art in dental age estimation. In: Adserias-Garriga J, editor. Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. San Diego: Elsevier. 2019.
    1. De Donno A, Angrisani C, Mele F, Introna F, Santoro V. Dental age estimation: Demirjian’s versus the other methods in different populations. A literature review. Med Sci Law. 2021;61(1_suppl):125–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802420934253

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources