Prevention of droplet dispersal with 'e-mask': A new daily use endoscopic mask during bronchoscopy
- PMID: 35781913
- DOI: 10.1111/resp.14321
Prevention of droplet dispersal with 'e-mask': A new daily use endoscopic mask during bronchoscopy
Abstract
Background and objective: Bronchoscopy is an airborne particle-generating procedure. However, few methods for safe bronchoscopy have been developed. To reduce airborne particles during bronchoscopy, we created an 'e-mask', which is a simple, disposable mask for patients. Our objective was to evaluate the e-mask's protective ability against airborne particles and to assess respiratory adverse events and complications.
Methods: Patients with stage 2-4 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. We performed visualization and quantifying experiments on airborne particles with and without the e-mask. We prospectively evaluated whether wearing the e-mask during bronchoscopy was associated with the incidence of patients requiring >5 L/min oxygen to maintain >90% oxygen saturation, and patients with >45 mm Hg end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2 ) elevation, in addition to complications, compared to historical controls.
Results: In the visualization experiment, more than ten thousand times of airborne particles were generated without the e-mask than with the e-mask. The volume of airborne particles was significantly reduced with the e-mask, compared to that without the e-mask (p = 0.011). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that wearing the e-mask had no significant effect on the incidence of patients requiring >5 L/min oxygen to maintain >90% oxygen saturation, (p = 0.959); however, wearing the e-mask was a significant factor in >45 mm Hg EtCO2 elevation (p = 0.026). No significant differences in complications were observed between the e-mask and control groups (5.8% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.395).
Conclusion: Wearing the e-mask during bronchoscopy significantly reduced the generation of airborne particles during bronchoscopy without increasing complications.
Keywords: COVID-19; airborne particle; bronchoscopy; coronavirus disease; e-mask; prevention; respiratory protective devices.
© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
Comment in
-
Another line of defence.Respirology. 2022 Oct;27(10):804-805. doi: 10.1111/resp.14348. Epub 2022 Aug 15. Respirology. 2022. PMID: 35971646 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727-33.
-
- Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA. 2020;324:782-93.
-
- Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol-generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections: a systematic review. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579388/
-
- Lentz RJ, Colt H. Summarizing societal guidelines regarding bronchoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respirology. 2020;25:574-7.
-
- Wahidi MM, Shojaee S, Lamb CR, Ost D, Maldonado F, Eapen G, et al. The use of bronchoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: CHEST/AABIP Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2020;158:1268-81.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources

