Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;12(7):3592-3602.
doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1060.

Right-to-left shunts in unexplained syncope: an age- and sex-matched case-control study

Affiliations

Right-to-left shunts in unexplained syncope: an age- and sex-matched case-control study

Dong Liu et al. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Syncope is common, but there is no clear cause for half of the patients diagnosed with syncope. Although suspected, there is limited evidence that right-to-left shunt (RLS) is related to syncope. This matched case-control study investigated the association between RLS (exposure) and unexplained syncope (outcome).

Methods: Consecutive unexplained syncope cases, together with age- and gender-matched controls who did not have syncope were recruited from 2009 to 2010 in the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University. A transcranial Doppler ultrasonography bubble test was applied for the ascertainment of RLS. The degree of RLS was categorized into grades 0 to 4 according to the number of microemboli, which were no shunt, <10 microbubbles (MB), 11-25 MB, >25 MB single spots pattern, and MB in a shower/curtain pattern, respectively. Cerebral small vessel diseases (SVD), including white matter hyperintensity, lacunes, and enlarged perivascular spaces, were rated on Magnetic resonance imaging. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine the association between RLS and unexplained syncope.

Results: A total of 52 cases and 52 age- and gender-matched controls were recruited. Among the 52 cases, 4 patients had a history of migraine. Among the 104 participants, 68 had no RLS; 13, 4, 7, and 12 presented with <10, 11-25, >25, and shower/curtain MB, respectively. The incidence of any RLS (Grade 1-4) was 48.1% (25/52) in cases and 21.2% (11/52) in controls (P=0.004). Conditional logistic regression showed an association between RLS and unexplained syncope [odds ratio (OR) =1.988; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.233 to 3.205; P=0.005] adjusting for SVD burden. Further analysis revealed a large OR between severe RLS (Grade 3-4) and unexplained syncope (OR =8.699; P=0.006). Furthermore, SVD burden was shown to be associated with syncope.

Conclusions: This matched case-control study showed a significant association between RLS and unexplained syncope, independent of cerebral SVD. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the causal relationship.

Keywords: Right-to-left shunt (RLS); microbubble; syncope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-21-1060/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrations for the transcranial Doppler ultrasonography bubble test. (A-E) represent the 5 grades of RLS, which are no shunt, <10 MB, 11–25 MB, >25 MB, and curtain pattern, respectively. Arrows indicate MB. LMCA, left middle cerebral artery; Dias, diastolic velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistance index; SD, systolic/diastolic flow velocity; RLS, right-to-left shunt; MB, microbubbles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The flow diagram for recruitment of cases. T-LOC, transient loss of consciousness; TIA, transient ischemic attack; TCD, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) ; European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Heart Failure Association (HFA); Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Moya A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J 2009;30:2631-71. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp298 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, Chen MH, Chen L, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002;347:878-85. 10.1056/NEJMoa012407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ganzeboom KS, Mairuhu G, Reitsma JB, Linzer M, Wieling W, van Dijk N. Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 35-60 years. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:1172-6. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00595.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman SA, Shapiro NI, Van Epp S, Kohen R, Arnold R, Moore R, Lee L, Wolfe RE, Lipsitz LA. Sex differences in the emergency department evaluation of elderly patients with syncope. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60:1202-5. 10.1093/gerona/60.9.1202 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yasa E, Ricci F, Magnusson M, Sutton R, Gallina S, Caterina R, Melander O, Fedorowski A. Cardiovascular risk after hospitalisation for unexplained syncope and orthostatic hypotension. Heart 2018;104:487-93. 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311857 - DOI - PMC - PubMed