Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 15:10:918365.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.918365. eCollection 2022.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Biofilters for Composting Exhaust Ammonia Removal

Affiliations

Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Biofilters for Composting Exhaust Ammonia Removal

Bin Shang et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Emissions of odorous compounds, such as ammonia (NH3), from composting have negative agronomic and environmental impacts. A biofilter is widely used for NH3 removal, with one of its potential detrimental by-products being nitrous oxide (N2O), which is a higher warming potential greenhouse gas (GHG). The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of empty bed retention time (EBRT) on GHG emissions from biofilters for removing NH3 from composting. Composting experimental trials lasted 6 weeks, and composting materials were mixtures of dead pigs and manure. Three groups of biofilters with 1.2 m-height, 0.3 m-inner diameter, and 1.0 m media depth were conducted with EBRT of 30, 60, and 100s, respectively. Each treatment was performed in triplicate, and the gas was monitored using the dynamic emission vessel method. The Spearman's correlation analysis showed a significantly positive correlation between inlet concentrations (ICs) of NH3 and increased N2O concentrations: ρ = 0.707, 0.762, and 0.607 with p ≤ 0.0001 for biofilters with EBRT of 30, 60, and 100s, respectively. The fraction of NH3-N denitrified into N2O-N in biofilters with EBRT of 60 and 100s was higher than that with EBRT of 30s. The total global warming potential (GWP) increased by 126%, 162%, and 144% for biofilters with EBRT of 30, 60, and 100s, respectively. These results indicated that biofilters with longer EBRT will lead to higher GWP production. Future research on odorous mitigation for composting with biofilters should focus more on greenhouse gas emissions.

Keywords: ammonia biofilter; empty bed retention time; greenhouse gases; nitrous oxide; waste management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of the composting and the biofiltration system.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Daily N2O concentrations (mean ± SE) at the biofilter inlet (IC) and outlet (OC).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Boxplot: Ratio of N2O concentration of the outlet and inlet at different biofilters (Box border means 25 and 75% percentile, the solid line in the box means the median value, the solid pentacle means the mean value, whisker means the maximum and minimum values, and the white circle means significant differences between the inlet and outlet).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Boxplot: Ratio of CH4 concentrations of the outlet and inlet at different biofilters (Box border means 25 and 75% percentile, the solid line in the box means the median value, a solid pentacle means the mean value, a whisker means the maximum and the minimum values, and the white circle means significant differences between the inlet and outlet).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Swine production: how sustainable is sustainability?
    Vonderohe CE, Brizgys LA, Richert JA, Radcliffe JS. Vonderohe CE, et al. Anim Front. 2022 Dec 14;12(6):7-17. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac085. eCollection 2022 Dec. Anim Front. 2022. PMID: 36530511 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Akdeniz N., Janni K. A. (2012). Full-scale Biofilter Reduction Efficiencies Assessed Using Portable 24-hour Sampling Units. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 62, 170–182. 10.1080/10473289.2011.639479 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akdeniz N., Janni K. A., Salnikov I. A. (2011). Biofilter Performance of Pine Nuggets and Lava Rock as Media. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 4974–4980. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.058 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buendia C E., Tanabe K., Kranjc A., Baasansuren J., Fukuda M., Ngarize S. (Editors) (2019). “2019Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories,” in Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use (Switzerland: IPCC; ), Volume 4.
    1. Cheng H., Hu Y. (2010). Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as a Renewable Source of Energy: Current and Future Practices in china. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 3816–3824. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clemens J., Cuhls C. (2003). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Mechanical and Biological Waste Treatment of Municipal Waste. Environ. Technol. 24, 745–754. 10.1080/09593330309385611 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources