Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 22:30:100263.
doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100263. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Domain-specific cognitive course in schizophrenia: Group- and individual-level changes over 10 years

Affiliations

Domain-specific cognitive course in schizophrenia: Group- and individual-level changes over 10 years

Camilla Bärthel Flaaten et al. Schizophr Res Cogn. .

Abstract

Cognitive impairments in schizophrenia are well-documented, present across several cognitive domains and found to be relatively stable over time. However, there is a high degree of heterogeneity and indications of domain-specific developmental courses. The present study investigated the 10-year cognitive course in participants with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and healthy controls on eight cognitive domains and a composite score, looking at group- and individual-level changes. A total of 75 FES participants and 91 healthy controls underwent cognitive assessment at baseline and follow-up. Linear mixed models were used for group-level analyses and reliable change index (RCI) analyses were used to investigate individual change. The prevalence of clinically significant impairment was explored at both time points, using a cut-off of < -1.5 SD, with significant cognitive impairment defined as impairment on ≥2 domains. Group-level analyses found main effects of group and time, and time by group interactions. Memory, psychomotor processing speed and verbal fluency improved, while learning, mental processing speed and working memory were stable in both groups. FES participants showed deteriorations in attention and cognitive control. Individual-level analyses mainly indicated stability in both FES and controls, except for a higher prevalence of decline in cognitive control in FES. At baseline, 68.8 % of FES participants had clinically significant impairment, compared to 62.3 % at follow-up. We mainly found long-term stability and modest increases in cognition over time in FES, as well as a high degree of within-group heterogeneity. We also found indications of deterioration in participants with worse cognitive performance at baseline.

Keywords: Cognition; First-episode schizophrenia; Long-term cognitive development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow. Participant flow and causes of attrition. SIHF: Sykehuset Innlandet HF (Innlandet hospital).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated marginal means of cognitive domain- and composite scores at baseline and follow-up. Line graphs showing group-level changes in each domain from baseline to follow-up. The schizophrenia group is represented by blue lines, and healthy controls are represented by green lines. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of domain and composite scores at baseline and follow-up. Distribution of scores from baseline to follow-up are presented in Raincloudplots, showing dispersion, box plots and individual trajectories. The schizophrenia group is shown in blue, and healthy controls are shown in green. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of participants with impairment on each domain. Percentage of participants reaching cut-off for impairment (−1.5 SD below mean) on each cognitive domain. FES: first episode schizophrenia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albus M., Hubmann W., Mohr F., et al. Neurocognitive functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia: results of a prospective 15-year follow-up study. Eur. Arch. Psychiatr. Clin. Neurosci. 2019;256(7):442–451. - PubMed
    1. Allen M., Poggiali D., Whitaker K., et al. Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;4:63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ammari N., Heinrichs R.W., Miles A.A. An investigation of 3 neurocognitive subtypes in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2010;121(1–3):32–38. - PubMed
    1. Bergh S., Hjorthøj C., Sørensen H.J., Fagerlund B., Austin S., Secher R.G. Predictors and longitudinal course of cognitive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, 10 years after baseline: the OPUS study. Schizophr. Res. 2016;175(1–3):57–63. - PubMed
    1. Blair J.R., Spreen O. Predicting premorbid IQ: a revision of the national adult reading test. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1989;3(2):129–136.

LinkOut - more resources