Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 22:48:101447.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101447. eCollection 2022 Jun.

The duration of spontaneous active and pushing phases of labour among 75,243 US women when intervention is minimal: A prospective, observational cohort study

Affiliations

The duration of spontaneous active and pushing phases of labour among 75,243 US women when intervention is minimal: A prospective, observational cohort study

Ellen L Tilden et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Friedman's curve, despite acknowledged limitations, has greatly influenced labour management. Interventions to hasten birth are now ubiquitous, challenging the contemporary study of normal labour. Our primary purpose was to characterise normal active labour and pushing durations in a large, contemporary sample experiencing minimal intervention, stratified by parity, age, and body mass index (BMI).

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the national, validated Midwives Alliance of North America 4·0 (MANA Stats) data registry (n = 75,243), prospectively collected between Jan 1, 2012 and Dec 31, 2018 to describe labour and birth in home and birth center settings where common obstetric interventions [i.e., oxytocin, planned cesarean] are not available. The MANA Stats cohort includes pregnant people who intended birth in these settings and prospectively collects labour and birth processes and outcomes regardless of where birth or postpartum care ultimately occurs. Survival curves were calculated to estimate labour duration percentiles (e.g. 10th, 50th, 90th, and others of interest), by parity and sub-stratified by age and BMI.

Findings: Compared to multiparous women (n = 32,882), nulliparous women (n = 15,331) had significantly longer active labour [e.g., median 7.5 vs. 3.3 h; 95th percentile 34.8 vs. 12.0 h] and significantly longer pushing phase [e.g., median 1.1 vs. 0.2 h; 95th percentile 5.5 vs. 1.1 h]. Among nulliparous women, maternal age >35 was associated with longer active first stage of labour and longer pushing phase, and BMI >30 kg/m² was associated with a longer active first stage of labour but a shorter pushing phase. Patterns among multiparous women were different, with those >35 years of age experiencing a slightly more rapid active labour and no difference in pushing duration, and those with BMI >30 kg/m² experiencing a slightly longer active labour but, similarly, no difference in pushing duration.

Interpretation: Nulliparous women had significantly longer active first stage and pushing phase durations than multiparous women, with further variation noted by age and by BMI. Contemporary US women with low-risk pregnancies who intended birth in settings absent common obstetric interventions and in spontaneous labour with a live, vertex, term, singleton, non-anomalous fetus experienced labour durations that were often longer than prior characterizations, particularly among nulliparous women. Results overcome prior and current sampling limitations to refine understanding of normal labour durations and time thresholds signaling 'labour dystocia'.

Funding: OHSU Nursing Innovation and OHSU University Shared Resources.

Keywords: Labour duration; Labour dystocia; Labour progress; Prolonged labour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ET declares the following interests: Co-Owner and Chief Scientific Officer for CenterMom, Inc. She has stock ownership in this company. Consultant and Director of Maternity Care for Stork Club, Inc. She receives payment for her work with Stork Club. JS, MC, MB, JL, JW, and AC have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Figure 1
Frequency of nulliparous women progressing to pushing during active second stage by active first stage of labour duration, in hours. Black lines on the x-axis mark active first stage of labour duration in 6 h intervals Blue numbers on the x-axis denote the number of observations and points of active phase of labour duration, in hours, when pushing began. Numbers from 0 to 800 on the y-axis denote the frequency count.
Fig. 2
Figure 2
Frequency of multiparous women progressing to pushing during active second stage by active first stage of labour duration, in hours. Black lines on the x-axis mark active first stage of labour duration in 6 h intervals Blue numbers on the x-axis denote the number of observations and point of active phase of labour duration, in hours, when pushing began. Numbers from 0 to 800 on the y-axis denote the frequency count.
Fig. 3
Figure 3
Frequency of nulliparous women progressing to birth by pushing during active second stage of labour duration, in hours. Black lines on the x-axis mark pushing duration in 1 h intervals. Blue numbers on the x-axis denote the number of observations and point of pushing duration, in hours, when birth occurred. Numbers from 0 to 2000 on the y-axis denote the frequency count.
Fig. 4
Figure 4
Frequency of multiparous women progressing to birth by pushing during active second stage of labour duration, in hours. Black lines on the x-axis mark pushing duration in 1 h intervals. Blue numbers on the x-axis denote the number of observations and point of pushing duration, in hours, when birth occurred. Numbers from 0 to 2000 on the y-axis denote the frequency count.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Friedman E.A. Labor in Multiparas: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1956;8(6):686–703. - PubMed
    1. Friedman E.A. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6(6):567–589. - PubMed
    1. Bonet M., Oladapo O.T., Souza J.P., Gulmezoglu A.M. Diagnostic accuracy of the partograph alert and action lines to predict adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2019;126(13):1524–1533. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caughey A., Cahill A.G., Guise J.M., Rouse D.J. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–193. - PubMed
    1. Vogel J.P., Betrán A.P., Vindevoghel N., et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–e270. - PubMed