Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 17:10:842880.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842880. eCollection 2022.

Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians for Home Death Certification in Shanghai: Application of SmartVA

Lei Chen  1 , Tian Xia  2 , Rasika Rampatige  3 , Hang Li  3 , Tim Adair  3 , Rohina Joshi  3   4   5 , Zhen Gu  6 , Huiting Yu  2 , Bo Fang  2 , Deirdre McLaughlin  3 , Alan D Lopez  7 , Chunfang Wang  1 , Zheng'an Yuan  1
Affiliations

Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Physicians for Home Death Certification in Shanghai: Application of SmartVA

Lei Chen et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Approximately 30% of deaths in Shanghai either occur at home or are not medically attended. The recorded cause of death (COD) in these cases may not be reliable. We applied the Smart Verbal Autopsy (VA) tool to assign the COD for a representative sample of home deaths certified by 16 community health centers (CHCs) from three districts in Shanghai, from December 2017 to June 2018. The results were compared with diagnoses from routine practice to ascertain the added value of using SmartVA. Overall, cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy improved from 0.93 (93%) to 0.96 after the application of SmartVA. A comparison with a "gold standard (GS)" diagnoses obtained from a parallel medical record review investigation found that 86.3% of the initial diagnoses made by the CHCs were assigned the correct COD, increasing to 90.5% after the application of SmartVA. We conclude that routine application of SmartVA is not indicated for general use in CHCs, although the tool did improve diagnostic accuracy for residual causes, such as other or ill-defined cancers and non-communicable diseases.

Keywords: CRVS system; Smart Verbal Autopsy; cause of death; demography; epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The field implementation procedures for this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau . 2020 Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Shanghai: China Statistics Press; 2020.
    1. Nichols EK, Byass P, Chandramohan D, Clark SJ, Flaxman AD, Jakob R, et al. . The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument: an international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 20. PLoS Med. (2018) 15:e1002486. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leitao J, Desai N, Aleksandrowicz L, Byass P, Miasnikof P, Tollman S, et al. . Comparison of physician-certified verbal autopsy with computer-coded verbal autopsy for cause of death assignment in hospitalized patients in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMC Med. (2014) 12:22. 10.1186/1741-7015-12-22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. James SL, Flaxman AD, Murray CJ. Performance of the Tariff Method: validation of a simple additive algorithm for analysis of verbal autopsies. Popul Health Metr. (2011) 9:31. 10.1186/1478-7954-9-31 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Lopez AD, Atkinson C, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Murray CJ. Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr. (2011) 9:32. 10.1186/1478-7954-9-32 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources