Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 22:2022:6342696.
doi: 10.1155/2022/6342696. eCollection 2022.

A Design of the Ecotourism Individualized Route Planning System Based on the Ecological Footprint Model

Hengxiu Lv  1
Affiliations

A Design of the Ecotourism Individualized Route Planning System Based on the Ecological Footprint Model

Hengxiu Lv. Comput Intell Neurosci. .

Retraction in

Abstract

In this study, aiming at the huge amount of information in the tourism field, the pressure of ecological environment, and tedious personalized route planning, an ecotourism personalized route planning system based on the ecological footprint model is designed. In order to recommend routes that meet the time limit and the starting and ending points of the user's choice, the tourist route recommendation problem is studied as a directional problem on the basis of comprehensively considering the popularity of scenic spots and the user's interest preferences as the scenic spots score. The scenic spot scoring strategy is scenic spot scoring, and the iterative local search strategy is used to plan tourist routes according to the optimization goal with the largest route score, and improve the real tourist routes, food, and accommodation strategies. On the basis of launched tourist routes, they recommend tourists' favorite food and accommodation. The model finally completes the fine arrangement of scenic spots, food, and accommodation in the whole tourist route. The system test results show that the system has obvious advantages in personalized path planning effect, excellent user feedback effect, and certain application value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tourism route planning framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ecological evaluation index system of tourist destination.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative evaluation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diversity evaluation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Rationality evaluation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of users' overall satisfaction evaluation on recommended routes.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison result of driving safety rate.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Comparison results of travel route time consumption.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lee C. C., Chen M. P. Ecological footprint, tourism development, and country risk: international evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2021;279(2) doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123671.123671 - DOI
    1. Zhan L., Lei Y., Li L., Ge J. Interprovincial transfer of ecological footprint among the region of Jing-Jin-Ji and other provinces in China: a quantification based on MRIO model. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2019;225(7):304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.204. - DOI
    1. Yang Y., Ling S., Zhang T., Yao C. Three-dimensional ecological footprint assessment for ecologically sensitive areas: a case study of the Southern Qin Ling piedmont in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2018;194(9):540–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.132. - DOI
    1. Husain D., Prakash R. Ecological footprint reduction of building envelope in a tropical climate. Journal of the Institution of Engineers . 2019;100(1):41–48. doi: 10.1007/s40030-018-0333-4. - DOI
    1. Liu H., Wang X., Yang J., Zhou X., Liu Y. The ecological footprint evaluation of low carbon campuses based on life cycle assessment: a case study of Tianjin, China. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2017;144(2):266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.017. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources