Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 15;38(3):346-352.
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12696. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index-a multicenter study

Affiliations

Two years after pulmonary vein isolation guided by ablation index-a multicenter study

Pedro A Sousa et al. J Arrhythm. .

Abstract

Background: The use of the Ablation Index (AI) software for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with higher acute effectiveness and higher 1-year arrhythmia freedom. There is, however, a lack of data concerning longer follow-up. We aim to evaluate the 2-year outcomes after a standardized AI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods: Prospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal AF ablation from January 2018 to July 2019. PVI was guided by a tailored AI value (≥500 for anterior segment, ≥450 for the roof segments and inferior segments, and 400 for the posterior wall) and an ILD ≤6 mm. The primary endpoints were acute and long-term effectiveness.

Results: The study included 218 (842 PV) patients (61% males, median age of 60 [IQR 49-68] years) with paroxysmal AF. First-pass isolation was obtained in 93% of the patients, with an acute reconnection occurring in 10.6% of the patients (3.2% of the PV) following adenosine trial. After a median follow-up of 26 (IQR 20-30) months, freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 83.4%, off-AAD. The rate of adverse events was 1.4%. Although procedural parameters differ across centers (p < 0.001), the acute (p = 0.56) and long-term effectiveness (p = 0.83) were consistent between centers.

Conclusions: Patients with paroxysmal AF submitted to an AI-guided PVI workflow presented high arrhythmia freedom at 2-years of follow-up.

Keywords: ablation index; pulmonary vein isolation; standardized workflow; tailored ablation; two years follow‐up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.A.S has received speaker fees from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Freedom from recurrence of atrial arrhythmia following PVI workflow guided by the ablation index software (83.4%, off‐AAD at 2 years of follow‐up)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Reproducibility among the centers regarding (A) procedural, radiofrequency, and fluoroscopy times and (B) acute and long‐term effectiveness

References

    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373–498. - PubMed
    1. Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Pisano E, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;112:627–35. - PubMed
    1. Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, et al. Recovey pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation. 2005;111:127–35. - PubMed
    1. A Willems S, Steven D, Servatius H, et al. Persistence of pulmonary vein isolation after robotic remote‐navigated ablation for atrial fibrillation and its relation to clinical outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1079–84. - PubMed
    1. Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:327–33. - PubMed