Physician gestalt for emergency department triage: A prospective videotaped study
- PMID: 35785459
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.14557
Physician gestalt for emergency department triage: A prospective videotaped study
Abstract
Objective: Appropriate triage in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is often challenging. Little is known about the role of physician gestalt in ED triage. We aimed to compare the accuracy of emergency physician gestalt against the currently used computerized triage process.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in the ED at an academic medical center. Adult patients aged ≥20 years were included and underwent a standard triage protocol. The patients underwent system-based triage using the computerized software the Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale. The entire triage process was recorded, and triage data were collected. Five physician raters provided triage levels (physician-based) according to their perceived urgency after reviewing videos. The primary outcome was hospital admission. The secondary outcomes were ED length of stay (EDLOS) and charges.
Results: In total, 656 patients were recruited (mean age 52 years, 50% male). The median system-based triage level was 3. By contrast, the median physician-based triage level was 4. The physician raters tended to provide lower triage levels than the system, with an average difference of 1. There was modest concordance between the two triage methods (correlation coefficient 0.30), with a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.18. The area under the receiver operating curve for the system- and physician-based triage in predicting hospital admission were similar (0.635 vs. 0.631, p = 0.896). Attending physicians appeared to have better performance than residents in predicting admission. The variation explained (R2 ) in EDLOS and charges were similar between the two triage methods (R2 = 3% for EDLOS, 7%-9% for charges).
Conclusions: Emergency physician gestalt for triage showed similar performance to a computerized system; however, physicians redistributed patients to lower triage levels. Physician gestalt has advantages for identifying low-risk patients. This approach may avoid undue time pressure for health care providers and promote rapid discharge.
Keywords: emergency department; physician gestalt; triage.
© 2022 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Mace SE, Mayer TA. Chapter 155 - triage. In: Baren JM, Rothrock SG, Brennan JA, Brown L, eds. Pediatric Emergency Medicine. W.B. Saunders; 2008:1087-1096.
-
- Fernandes CM, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, et al. Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force. J Emerg Nurs 2005;31:39-50; quiz 118.
-
- Ng CJ, Yen ZS, Tsai JC, et al. Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerised five-level triage system. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:1026-1031.
-
- Ng CJ, Chien CY, Seak JC, et al. Validation of the five-tier Taiwan triage and acuity scale for prehospital use by emergency medical technicians. Emerg Med J. 2019;36:472-478.
-
- Bullard MJ, Musgrave E, Warren D, et al. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) guidelines 2016. CJEM. 2017;19:S18-S27.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources