Impact of narrowing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation
- PMID: 35785460
- DOI: 10.1111/tid.13900
Impact of narrowing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation
Abstract
Background: Although infections are a significant potential complication among patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, standardized surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens are not well defined. At Montefiore Medical Center, a 4-drug SIP regimen containing fluconazole, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin was previously utilized. In January 2020, the antimicrobial stewardship program implemented a 2-drug SIP regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin to limit exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study evaluated LVAD-associated infection rates prior to and following the SIP revision.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1/2018 to 4/2021 was performed. Infections were classified using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions. Infection rates at 2 weeks, 30 days, and 90 days post-implantation in the 4-drug SIP regimen (1/2018-12/2019) and the 2-drug SIP regimen (1/2020 to 4/2021) were compared.
Results: A total of 71 patients were included. The number of patients with LVAD-associated infections (including surgical site infections) was not significantly different in either SIP group at 2 weeks (9% vs. 4%, p = .64), 30 days (9% vs. 11%, p = .99), or 90 days (19% vs. 14%, p = .75). There was no statistically significant difference in 30 or 90-day mortality. LVAD-associated gram-negative (7% vs. 7%; p > .99) and fungal (5% vs. 0%; p = .51) infections were uncommon. The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus, and the most common type of infection was pneumonia in both SIP groups.
Conclusion: No significant difference in LVAD-associated infections or infection-related mortality was observed with de-escalation of perioperative antibiotics. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to endorse the findings of this study.
Keywords: LVAD-associated infections; antimicrobial stewardship; device infection; left ventricular assist devices; surgical infection prophylaxis; surgical site infections.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Stulak JM, Mehta V, Schirger JA, et al. Temporal differences in causes of mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(6):1969-1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.01.036
-
- Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:157-187.
-
- Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. New Engl J Med. 2001;345(20):1435-1443.
-
- Nienaber JJC, Kusne S, Riaz T, et al. Clinical manifestations and management of left ventricular assist device-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(10):1438-1448.
-
- Mourad A, Arif S, Bishawi M, Milano C, Miller RA, Maskarinec SA. Surgical infection prophylaxis prior to left ventricular assist device implantation: a survey of clinical practice. J Card Surg. 2020;35(10):2672-2678.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
