Remimazolam versus traditional sedatives for procedural sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes
- PMID: 35785930
- DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16631-9
Remimazolam versus traditional sedatives for procedural sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes
Abstract
Introduction: Remimazolam is a novel and ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine currently approved for procedural sedation and induction of general anaesthesia, with a possible indication for ICU sedation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and traditional sedatives for patients undergoing procedural sedation.
Evidence acquisition: We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of procedural sedation performed with remimazolam versus traditional sedatives. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference.
Evidence synthesis: Eleven studies of 2356 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that remimazolam was associated with a higher procedure success rate (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.52, P=0.006; I2=99%), a shorter duration of recovery after procedure (SMD: -0.56, 95% CI: -0.98, -0.14, P=0.009; I2=89%), and an earlier patient discharge after procedure (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI: -0.49, -0.25, P<0.00001; I2=0%) in comparison with traditional sedatives. There were no statistically significant differences in onset time, procedure time, and cognitive recovery between remimazolam and traditional sedatives groups. Remimazolam significantly decreased the rate of bradycardia (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.97, P=0.04; I2=0%), hypotension (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.80, P=0.001; I2=80%), and respiratory depression/hypoxia (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.83, P=0.01; I2=61%) compared to traditional sedatives.
Conclusions: Remimazolam is a safe and effective sedative for procedural sedation on account of a higher success procedure rate, a faster recovery, a shorter discharge time, and a superior safety profile in comparison with traditional sedatives. Larger sample-sized and well-designed clinical trials are needed to verify our finding.
Similar articles
-
Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PeerJ. 2023 Jun 12;11:e15495. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15495. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37334113 Free PMC article.
-
Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Anestesiol. 2022 Dec;88(12):1035-1042. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16817-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022. PMID: 36326772
-
Comparison of remimazolam and propofol about safety outcome indicators during general anesthesia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jun;89(6):553-564. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17034-9. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023. PMID: 36852570
-
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam and Propofol for Sedation in Adults Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 1;61(4):646. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040646. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40282937 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in bronchoscopic sedation: A meta-analysis.World J Clin Cases. 2024 Feb 26;12(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i6.1120. World J Clin Cases. 2024. PMID: 38464931 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effect of combination of remimazolam and sevoflurane on elderly patients' recovery quality from general anesthesia after laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Feb 13;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00501-3. Perioper Med (Lond). 2025. PMID: 39948637 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of intraoperative intravenous remimazolam on the postoperative quality of recovery after noncardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2025 Mar 20;20(3):e0319044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319044. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40112016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Versus Etomidate for Induction of General Anesthesia: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 12;13:e55948. doi: 10.2196/55948. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38865185 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia: systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PeerJ. 2024 Aug 26;12:e17930. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17930. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39210920 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term sedation with remimazolam besylate versus propofol in critically ill patients during invasive mechanical ventilation: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized non-inferior trial.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1139872. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1139872. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37576823 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous