Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;31(4):576-584.
doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2091763. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

Investigating mental health service user views of stigma on Twitter during COVID-19: a mixed-methods study

Sonja M Jansli  1   2 , Georgie Hudson  1   2 , Esther Negbenose  1   2 , Sinan Erturk  1   2 , Til Wykes  1   2 , Sagar Jilka  1   2   3
Affiliations

Investigating mental health service user views of stigma on Twitter during COVID-19: a mixed-methods study

Sonja M Jansli et al. J Ment Health. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Mental health stigma on social media is well studied, but not from the perspective of mental health service users. Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) increased mental health discussions and may have impacted stigma.Objectives: (1) to understand how service users perceive and define mental health stigma on social media; (2) how COVID-19 shaped mental health conversations and social media use.Methods: We collected 2,700 tweets related to seven mental health conditions: schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism, eating disorders, OCD, and addiction. Twenty-seven service users rated them as stigmatising or neutral, followed by focus group discussions. Focus group transcripts were thematically analysed.Results: Participants rated 1,101 tweets (40.8%) as stigmatising. Tweets related to schizophrenia were most frequently classed as stigmatising (411/534, 77%). Tweets related to depression or anxiety were least stigmatising (139/634, 21.9%). A stigmatising tweet depended on perceived intention and context but some words (e.g. "psycho") felt stigmatising irrespective of context.Discussion: The anonymity of social media seemingly increased stigma, but COVID-19 lockdowns improved mental health literacy. This is the first study to qualitatively investigate service users' views of stigma towards various mental health conditions on Twitter and we show stigma is common, particularly towards schizophrenia. Service user involvement is vital when designing solutions to stigma.

Keywords: England; Twitter; co-production; mental health; patient and public involvement; social media; stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example tweets for participant rating.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A Venn diagram comparing the current study with previous literature of mental health stigma.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berry, N., Lobban, F., Belousov, M., Emsley, R., Nenadic, G., & Bucci, S. (2017). #WhyWeTweetMH: Understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e107. 10.2196/jmir.6173 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - DOI
    1. Budenz, A., Klassen, A., Purtle, J., Yom Tov, E., Yudell, M., & Massey, P. (2020). Mental illness and bipolar disorder on Twitter: Implications for stigma and social support. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 29(2), 191–199. - PubMed
    1. Budhwani, H., & De, P. (2019). Perceived stigma in health care settings and the physical and mental health of people of color in the United States. Health Equity, 3(1), 73–80. 10.1089/heq.2018.0079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corrigan, P. W., Morris, S. B., Michaels, P. J., Rafacz, J. D., & Rüsch, N. (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric Services, 63(10), 963–973. 10.1176/appi.ps.201100529 - DOI - PubMed