Phantom Networks: Discrepancies Between Reported And Realized Mental Health Care Access In Oregon Medicaid
- PMID: 35787079
- PMCID: PMC9876384
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00052
Phantom Networks: Discrepancies Between Reported And Realized Mental Health Care Access In Oregon Medicaid
Abstract
Understanding the extent to which beneficiaries can "realize" access to reported provider networks is imperative in mental health care, where there are significant unmet needs. We compared listings of providers in network directories against provider networks empirically constructed from administrative claims among members who were ages sixty-four and younger and enrolled in Oregon's Medicaid managed care organizations between January 1 and December 31, 2018. "In-network" providers were those with any medical claims filed for at least five unique Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in a given health plan. They included primary care providers, specialty mental health prescribers, and nonprescribing mental health clinicians. Overall, 58.2 percent of network directory listings were "phantom" providers who did not see Medicaid patients, including 67.4 percent of mental health prescribers, 59.0 percent of mental health nonprescribers, and 54.0 percent of primary care providers. Significant discrepancies between the providers listed in directories and those whom enrollees can access suggest that provider network monitoring and enforcement may fall short if based on directory information.
Figures
Comment in
-
How Phantom Networks And Other Barriers Impede Progress On Mental Health Insurance Reform.Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jul;41(7):1023-1025. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00541. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022. PMID: 35787083
References
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Online provider directory review report [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2018. 28 Nov [cited 2022 May 19]. [Third year]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/ManagedCareMarketing/Downloads...
-
- Adelberg M, Frakt A, Polsky D, Strollo MK. Improving provider directory accuracy: can machine-readable directories help? Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(5):241–5. - PubMed
-
- Burman A, Haeder SF. Potemkin protections: assessing provider directory accuracy and timely access for four specialties in California. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022;47(3):319–49. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
