Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;13(4):402-406.
doi: 10.1037/per0000563.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence

Affiliations
Review

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence

Salome Vanwoerden et al. Personal Disord. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

In the 10 years following the publishing of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), studies have accumulated testing the validity and utility of the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the context of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this article, we review the studies that have tested how well the AMPD conceptualization of BPD captures the traditional (DSM-5, Section II) conceptualization of BPD. Although we note that studies that measure the full conceptualization of the AMPD-BPD are limited compared with studies focusing on a single aspect of the AMPD, studies reviewed suggest that the AMPD conceptualization of BPD largely overlaps with Section II, is associated with a similar range of external constructs, and can be measured with similar levels of interrater reliability. This evidence is promising in terms of the goal of the AMPD developers to not lose relevant and clinically meaningful information associated with traditional conceptualizations of BPD. However, further applied research is needed to understand how the AMPD may improve upon our existing categorical conceptualization of BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publisher.
    1. Amini M, Pourshahbaz A, Mohammadkhani P, Khodaie Ardakani MR, & Lotfi M (2015). The DSM-5 levels of personality functioning and severity of Iranian patients with antisocial and borderline personality disorders. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(8), Article e19885. 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.19885 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JL, & Sellbom M (2018). Evaluating the DSM-5 Section III personality disorder impairment criteria Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(1), 51–61. 10.1037/per0000217 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Sansone RA, & Songer DA (2016). Comparing external correlates of DSM-5 Section II and Section III dimensional trait operationalizations of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(2), 193–210. 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_189 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson J, Snider S, Sellbom M, Krueger R, & Hopwood C(2014). A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216(3), 363–372. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms