Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 1;25(5):364-369.
doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000846. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Is it time to personalise glucose targets during critical illness?

Affiliations
Review

Is it time to personalise glucose targets during critical illness?

Mark P Plummer et al. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Dysglycaemia complicates most critical care admissions and is associated with harm, yet glucose targets, particularly in those with preexisting diabetes, remain controversial. This review will summarise advances in the literature regarding personalised glucose targets in the critically ill.

Recent findings: Observational data suggest that the degree of chronic hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients with diabetes attenuates the relationship between mortality and several metrics of dysglycaemia, including blood glucose on admission, and mean blood glucose, glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia in the intensive care unit. The interaction between acute and chronic hyperglycaemia has recently been quantified with novel metrics of relative glycaemia including the glycaemic gap and stress hyperglycaemia ratio. Small pilot studies provided preliminary data that higher blood glucose thresholds in critically ill patients with chronic hyperglycaemia may reduce complications of intravenous insulin therapy as assessed with biomakers. Although personalising glycaemic targets based on preexisting metabolic state is an appealing concept, the recently published CONTROLLING trial did not identify a mortality benefit with individualised glucose targets, and the effect of personalised glucose targets on patient-centred outcomes remains unknown.

Summary: There is inadequate data to support adoption of personalised glucose targets into care of critically ill patients. However, there is a strong rationale empowering future trials utilising such an approach for patients with chronic hyperglycaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Yousif N, Rawal S, Jurczak M, et al. Endogenous glucose production in critical illness. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 36:344–359.
    1. Hanna M, Balintescu A, Glassford N, et al. Glycemic lability index and mortality in critically ill patients – a multicenter cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2021; 65:1267–1275.
    1. Krinsley JS, Preiser JC. Is it time to abandon glucose control in critically ill adult patients? Curr Opin Crit Care 2019; 25:299–306.
    1. Soeters PB, Shenkin A, Sobotka L, et al. The anabolic role of the Warburg, Cori-cycle and Crabtree effects in health and disease. Clin Nutr 2021; 40:2988–2998.
    1. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1283–1297.