Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 4;12(1):11235.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14986-1.

Machine learning predicts clinically significant health related quality of life improvement after sensorimotor rehabilitation interventions in chronic stroke

Affiliations

Machine learning predicts clinically significant health related quality of life improvement after sensorimotor rehabilitation interventions in chronic stroke

Wan-Wen Liao et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Health related quality of life (HRQOL) reflects individuals perceived of wellness in health domains and is often deteriorated after stroke. Precise prediction of HRQOL changes after rehabilitation interventions is critical for optimizing stroke rehabilitation efficiency and efficacy. Machine learning (ML) has become a promising outcome prediction approach because of its high accuracy and easiness to use. Incorporating ML models into rehabilitation practice may facilitate efficient and accurate clinical decision making. Therefore, this study aimed to determine if ML algorithms could accurately predict clinically significant HRQOL improvements after stroke sensorimotor rehabilitation interventions and identify important predictors. Five ML algorithms including the random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network, support vector machine and logistic regression were used. Datasets from 132 people with chronic stroke were included. The Stroke Impact Scale was used for assessing multi-dimensional and global self-perceived HRQOL. Potential predictors included personal characteristics and baseline cognitive/motor/sensory/functional/HRQOL attributes. Data were divided into training and test sets. Tenfold cross-validation procedure with the training data set was used for developing models. The test set was used for determining model performance. Results revealed that RF was effective at predicting multidimensional HRQOL (accuracy: 85%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC: 0.86) and global perceived recovery (accuracy: 80%; AUC-ROC: 0.75), and KNN was effective at predicting global perceived recovery (accuracy: 82.5%; AUC-ROC: 0.76). Age/gender, baseline HRQOL, wrist/hand muscle function, arm movement efficiency and sensory function were identified as crucial predictors. Our study indicated that RF and KNN outperformed the other three models on predicting HRQOL recovery after sensorimotor rehabilitation in stroke patients and could be considered for future clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of model development and validation process. Subject data were randomized into a training set and a test set. The training set was 70% of the data and the test set was 30% of the data. For the training data set, the tenfold cross validation procedure was used to train and build 5 machine learning models (i.e., the RF, KNN, ANN, SVM and LG) in which the data was randomly split into 10 groups (9 groups for training and 1 group for validation). The tenfold cross validation process repeated until all 10 groups of data were trained and validated. The tenfold cross validation process was performed for all 5 machine learning models. After the 5 models were built, the test data set was entered into the 5 models to determine the model performance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lin X-J, Lin IM, Fan S-Y. Methodological issues in measuring health-related quality of life. Tzu Chi Med. J. 2013;25:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2012.09.002. - DOI
    1. Guyatt GH, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, Revicki DA, Symonds TL, Varricchio CG, et al. Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2007;82:1229–1239. doi: 10.4065/82.10.1229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2021 update. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA. Quality of life after stroke: The importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009;27:204–214. doi: 10.1159/000200461. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36:1480–1484. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types