Gantry-needle-target alignment technique for CT-guided needle approaches to the skull base and cranio-cervical junction
- PMID: 35788697
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03005-9
Gantry-needle-target alignment technique for CT-guided needle approaches to the skull base and cranio-cervical junction
Abstract
Purpose: CT-guided percutaneous procedures involving the skull base and atlanto-axial cervical spine pose particular challenges due to high density of vital vascular and nervous structures and because the ideal needle trajectory often has a cranio-caudal obliquity different from the axial scan plane. We describe how the variable CT gantry tilt, combined with gantry-needle-target alignment technique, is used to obtain precise and safe needle placement in conventional and non-conventional approaches to the skull base and the atlanto-axial spine.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive CT-guided needle accesses to the skull base and atlanto-axial spine performed for tissue sampling through fine-needle aspirates and core biopsies, cementoplasty of neoplastic lytic lesions of atlanto-axial spine, pain management injections, and dural puncture for cerebro-spinal fluid sampling. All the accesses were performed with the gantry-needle-target alignment technique. Procedural complications were recorded.
Results: Thirty-nine CT-guided procedures were analyzed. Paramaxillary approach was used in 15 cases, postero-lateral in 11, subzygomatic in 3. Nine non-conventional approach were performed: submastoid in 3 cases, suprazygomatic in 2, trans-nasal in 2, trans-mastoid in 1, and trans-auricular in 1. Two peri-procedural complications occurred: one asymptomatic and one resolved within 24 h. All the procedures were successfully completed with successful needle access to the target.
Conclusion: The gantry tilt and gantry-needle-target alignment technique allows to obtain double-oblique needle accesses for CT-guided procedures involving the skull base and atlanto-axial cervical spine, minimizing uncertainty of needle trajectory and obtaining safe needle placement in conventional and non-conventional approaches.
Keywords: CT-guided interventions; Skull base.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Eckel TS, Bartynski WS (2009) Epidural steroid injections and selective nerve root blocks. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 12:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2009.06.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Falco F (2009) Systematic review of diagnostic utility and therapeutic effectiveness of cervical facet joint interventions. Pain Phys 2(12):323–344. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2009/12/323 - DOI
-
- Anselmetti GC, Bonaldi G, Carpeggiani P et al (2011) Vertebral Augmentation: 7 Years Experience. In: Alexandre A, Masini M, Menchetti PPM (eds) Advances in minimally invasive surgery and therapy for spine and nerves. Springer, Vienna, pp 147–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_23
-
- Gangi A, Tsoumakidou G, Buy X et al (2011) Percutaneous techniques for cervical pain of discal origin. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 15:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275601 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Zundert J, Vanelderen P, Kessels A et al (2012) Radiofrequency treatment of facet-related pain: evidence and controversies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-011-0237-8 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical