Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270812.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270812. eCollection 2022.

Comparison between propofol and alfaxalone anesthesia for the evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs utilizing computerized software

Po-Ching Pan  1 , Christine Savidge  1 , Pierre Amsellem  1 , Stephanie Hamilton  1
Affiliations

Comparison between propofol and alfaxalone anesthesia for the evaluation of laryngeal function in healthy dogs utilizing computerized software

Po-Ching Pan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Laryngeal paralysis is a well-documented cause of upper respiratory tract obstruction in canines. Diagnosis of laryngeal paralysis is usually made by visual evaluation of laryngeal motion whilst patients are under a light-plane of anesthesia. However, in human studies of laryngeal function evaluation, it has been shown that subjective scoring can lead to significant interobserver variance, which may cause false diagnosis. In this study, we propose to introduce a more objective method of assessing laryngeal function using GlotAnTools and Tracker software to directly measure laryngeal motion in anaesthetized patients. Additionally, two anesthetic agents, alfaxalone and propofol, were compared in this study to assess their relative effect on laryngeal motion and thus their suitability for use in this diagnostic process. This study was a two-stage, cross-over, 1:1 randomization, with two active treatment arms. Ten beagles (10-18 months, five males and five females) were exposed to both anesthetic agents and laryngeal motion was recorded using videoendoscopy. GlotAnTools and Tracker software were applied to the recorded images to measure glottal gap area (A) and length (L). A normalized measure of laryngeal function-computed as A/L-was created, representing the "elongatedness" of the rima glottidis. The glottal gap area was significantly reduced in dogs receiving alfaxalone. This study objectively establishes that alfaxalone impacted laryngeal motion significantly more than propofol and confirms the capability of these computational methods to detect differences in laryngeal motion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Bar chart for the variations (A/L) between dogs and different agents.
The red bars indicate dogs receiving alfaxalone, and the blue bars indicate dogs receiving propofol.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Macphail C, Monnett E. Laryngeal diseases. In: Bonagura JD TD, ed. Kirk’s current veterinary therapy XIV. St. Louis: Saunders; 2009. pp. 627–630.
    1. Burbidge HM. A review of laryngeal paralysis in dogs. Br Vet J. 1995;151: 71–82. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(05)80066-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith MM. Diagnosing laryngeal paralysis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2000;36: 383–384. doi: 10.5326/15473317-36-5-383 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broome C, Burbidge HM, Pfeiffer DU. Prevalence of laryngeal paresis in dogs undergoing general anaesthesia. Aust Vet J. 2000;78: 769–772. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2000.tb10449.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radlinsky MG, Williams J, Frank PM, Cooper TC. Comparison of three clinical techniques for the diagnosis of laryngeal paralysis in dogs. Vet Surg. 2009;38: 434–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00506.x - DOI - PubMed